Thread View: comp.os.os2.misc
6 messages
6 total messages
Started by Paul Campbell
Fri, 12 Mar 1993 14:35
VM ==> OS/2
Author: Paul Campbell
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 1993 14:35
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 1993 14:35
9 lines
1327 bytes
1327 bytes
hi all, i would appreciate hearing from anyone who has migrated applications from VM to OS/2 (486). i don't know any of the details of either environment (i am posting for a colleague) except to say that he has PROFS, SQL/DS and REXX/XEDIT concerns. he is especially interested moving PL/I applications. is there a PL/I compiler for OS/2, either IBM's or 3rd party? does anyone know of PL/I code translator, maybe PL/I to C? thanks /pc
Re: VM ==> OS/2
Author: Dave Silvia
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 1993 15:38
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 1993 15:38
39 lines
2624 bytes
2624 bytes
In article <16B8F86E1.M21816@MBVM.Mitre.Org> M21816@MBVM.Mitre.Org (Paul Campbell) writes: >hi all, > >i would appreciate hearing from anyone who has migrated applications >from VM to OS/2 (486). i don't know any of the details of either >environment (i am posting for a colleague) except to say that he has >PROFS, SQL/DS and REXX/XEDIT concerns. he is especially interested >moving PL/I applications. is there a PL/I compiler for OS/2, either >IBM's or 3rd party? does anyone know of PL/I code translator, maybe >PL/I to C? thanks /pc This is *NOT* a flame, just a personal observation. This sounds to me like 'Does anyone know how to convert a druid to astrology?'. 'Migrate' here is like 'port' elsewhere. The assumption is that there are more commonalities than not. Having worked in/with both systems, my best advice (and it's really not advice, just an observation) is dump the old and pick up the new (no time bias should be implied, just 'what I used to use' vs. 'what I use now':). Trying to 'hang' on to the old methodology (i.e., understand a system new to the user in terms of the system the user is used to [when they are *far* separated]) will only aggravate your trials. That said, here are the tenuous connections: PROFS: ? PL/I: ? REXX: Batch files (*NOT* nearly as powerful) XEDIT: Only third party. Brief comes about as close as any for approximating a language. Again, painful as it may seem, understand the underlying algorithm of your 'migrating' applications and don't 'migrate', rewrite them in OS/2 native languages as applicable. (After all, that's what the writers of OS/2 had to do in trying to emulate existing IBM archetechtures;^} [ it is questionable that they succeeded ]). Dave S.
Re: VM ==> OS/2
Author: WILLIAM PRICE
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 1993 01:25
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 1993 01:25
42 lines
2318 bytes
2318 bytes
In article <1993Mar13.153843.26423@unet.net.com> dsilvia@blunt.net.com (Dave Silvia) writes: >In article <16B8F86E1.M21816@MBVM.Mitre.Org> M21816@MBVM.Mitre.Org (Paul Campbell) writes: >>hi all, >> >>i would appreciate hearing from anyone who has migrated applications >>from VM to OS/2 (486). i don't know any of the details of either >>environment (i am posting for a colleague) except to say that he has >>PROFS, SQL/DS and REXX/XEDIT concerns. he is especially interested >>moving PL/I applications. is there a PL/I compiler for OS/2, either >>IBM's or 3rd party? does anyone know of PL/I code translator, maybe >>PL/I to C? thanks /pc > >This is *NOT* a flame, just a personal observation. >.......... ... Oh ?! > >That said, here are the tenuous connections: > >PROFS: ? > >PL/I: ? Liant sells a PL/I for DOS using the Phar Lap DOS Extender. It ought to run in a DOS window under OS/2. > >REXX: Batch files (*NOT* nearly as powerful) REXX is built into OS/2 > >XEDIT: Only third party. Brief comes about as close as any for approximating > a language. Mansfield sells KEDIT, which is very close to XEDIT, plus reasonable PC extension (blocking, etc.). It is available as a native OS/2 app, as well as for DOS. > ...... > >Dave S. I am looking to do the same thing, porting RAMIS database stuff to FOCUS. Bill Price
Re: VM ==> OS/2
Author: Alton Bledsoe
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 1993 03:48
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 1993 03:48
54 lines
3518 bytes
3518 bytes
In article <1993Mar13.153843.26423@unet.net.com> dsilvia@blunt.net.com (Dave Silvia) writes: >In article <16B8F86E1.M21816@MBVM.Mitre.Org> M21816@MBVM.Mitre.Org (Paul Campbell) writes: >>hi all, >> >>i would appreciate hearing from anyone who has migrated applications >>from VM to OS/2 (486). i don't know any of the details of either >>environment (i am posting for a colleague) except to say that he has >>PROFS, SQL/DS and REXX/XEDIT concerns. he is especially interested >>moving PL/I applications. is there a PL/I compiler for OS/2, either >>IBM's or 3rd party? does anyone know of PL/I code translator, maybe >>PL/I to C? thanks /pc > >This is *NOT* a flame, just a personal observation. This sounds to me like >'Does anyone know how to convert a druid to astrology?'. 'Migrate' here is >like 'port' elsewhere. The assumption is that there are more commonalities >than not. Having worked in/with both systems, my best advice (and it's really >not advice, just an observation) is dump the old and pick up the new (no time >bias should be implied, just 'what I used to use' vs. 'what I use now':). >Trying to 'hang' on to the old methodology (i.e., understand a system new to >the user in terms of the system the user is used to [when they are *far* >separated]) will only aggravate your trials. > >That said, here are the tenuous connections: > >PROFS: ? > >PL/I: ? > >REXX: Batch files (*NOT* nearly as powerful) > >XEDIT: Only third party. Brief comes about as close as any for approximating > a language. > >Again, painful as it may seem, understand the underlying algorithm of your >'migrating' applications and don't 'migrate', rewrite them in OS/2 native >languages as applicable. (After all, that's what the writers of OS/2 had to >do in trying to emulate existing IBM archetechtures;^} [ it is questionable >that they succeeded ]). > >Dave S. Sorry -- but that is not a real world answer, Dave. And sorry to the orig. poster -- I have migrated other things but not PL/1 BUt I think you posted to the right groups to get an answer. Best bet is to consult the IBM EVIS database. I will try for you. I am sure someone some where is doing this. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Al Bledsoe 214 869 3113 x 2015 home:214 327 2544 abledsoe@feenix.metronet.com Al.Bledsoe@office.wang.com ( UNTIL APRIL 5 1993 !!! ) I once had a 67 charger with a 440 and a .513 Belvadere rearend, 4 bucket seats and one bumber sticker that simply read: BULLSHIT. ...layed a lot of rubber getting out of town!
Re: VM ==> OS/2
Author: Derrick L. Hatcher, 615/481-0061...
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 1993 19:03
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 1993 19:03
35 lines
2310 bytes
2310 bytes
In article <16B9011F35.Q4105@pucc.Princeton.EDU> Q4105@pucc.Princeton.EDU (WILLIAM PRICE) writes:
>In article <16B8F86E1.M21816@MBVM.Mitre.Org> M21816@MBVM.Mitre.Org (Paul Campbell) writes:
>>i would appreciate hearing from anyone who has migrated applications
>>from VM to OS/2 (486). i don't know any of the details of either
>>environment (i am posting for a colleague) except to say that he has
>>PROFS, SQL/DS and REXX/XEDIT concerns. he is especially interested
>>moving PL/I applications. is there a PL/I compiler for OS/2, either
>>IBM's or 3rd party? does anyone know of PL/I code translator, maybe
>>PL/I to C? thanks /pc
>
>PL/I: ?
Liant sells a PL/I for DOS using the Phar Lap DOS Extender.
It ought to run in a DOS window under OS/2.
>
I just received a card advertising PL/I Package/2 for OS/2. It is an IBM
product. Here is the pertinent information:
International Business Machines Corporation
STL PL/I Package/2
Department STL5-H05Q06
P.O. Box 2150
Atlanta, GA 30301-9948
1 (800) 426-3346 ext STL10.
If you call you will receive a FREE EVALUATION COPY and a FREE PRODUCT VIDEO
(IBM's shouts, not mine).
I know nothing else about the package. Heck, I don't even know what PL/I is,
for that matter. Hope this helps.
Derrick
Re: VM ==> OS/2
Author: Todd Kennedy
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 1993 19:43
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 1993 19:43
24 lines
2064 bytes
2064 bytes
In article <1993Mar13.153843.26423@unet.net.com> dsilvia@blunt.net.com (Dave Silvia) writes: >In article <16B8F86E1.M21816@MBVM.Mitre.Org> M21816@MBVM.Mitre.Org (Paul Campbell) writes: >>hi all, >> >>i would appreciate hearing from anyone who has migrated applications >>from VM to OS/2 (486). i don't know any of the details of either >>environment (i am posting for a colleague) except to say that he has >>PROFS, SQL/DS and REXX/XEDIT concerns. he is especially interested >>moving PL/I applications. is there a PL/I compiler for OS/2, either >>IBM's or 3rd party? does anyone know of PL/I code translator, maybe >>PL/I to C? thanks /pc > >PL/I: ? I know this isn't the correct newsgroup, but, just for the record, IBM does in fact have a PL/I compiler for OS/2. (I know because my father was a manager of the team who developed it) Todd -- ============================================================================ Todd M. Kennedy Email: todd@library.CalPoly.EDU or Polycat System Support tkennedy@flute.CalPoly.EDU San Luis Obispo, CA Phone: (805) 756-1189
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads