Article View: comp.os.os2.programmer
Article #3315Re: Back from the Dead: status, and questions
From: Tim Francis
Date: Thu, 07 Jan 1993 00:32
Date: Thu, 07 Jan 1993 00:32
36 lines
1808 bytes
1808 bytes
In article <623.2B4904C6@kennel.FIDONET.ORG>, Michael.Nelson@f20.n125.z1.FIDONET.ORG (Michael Nelson) writes: > >Hello Tim! > >Monday January 04 1993 10:10, Tim Francis wrote to All: > >TF-> The PDK contains beta copies of the next release. The CSDs provide >TF-> fixes for the current release. Do not try to combine the two -- >TF-> they're not in the least bit compatible. > > Hmmm. It wouldn't install the CSD that is in the PDK, either, and the info file for that CSD says: > >Additional Information: > > C Set/2 Corrective Service Diskettes (CSD) > >Description: > >The OS/2 Corrective Service Facility is a utility that applies fixes >(service) to the OS/2 Applications. This CSD may be applied to both >the the C Set/2 that is included on this disk, or to C Set/2 Version >1.0. > > - Michael - > >-- >Michael Nelson I can assure you that we have NOT shipped ANY CSDs for the beta V2 (PDK) compiler. Unless there is a copy of version 1 of the compiler on the PDK hidden away somewhere (and there's not, that I know of), you cannot install the PDK to "the C Set/2 that is included on this disk". When you think about it, it would make no sense to ship a fix at the same time as the code -- we would just ship the fixed code. -tim
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<19930106.163254.15@almaden.ibm.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!vnet.ibm.comReferences:
<623.2B4904C6@kennel.FIDONET.ORG>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!vnet.ibm.com From: francis@vnet.ibm.com (Tim Francis) Message-ID: <19930106.163254.15@almaden.ibm.com> Date: Wed, 6 Jan 93 19:32:14 EST Subject: Re: Back from the Dead: status, and questions Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.programmer References: <623.2B4904C6@kennel.FIDONET.ORG> Reply-To: francis@vnet.ibm.com Organization: IBM Canada Lab, WorkFrame/2 development Disclaimer: This posting represents the poster's views, not those of IBM Lines: 36