🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.os.os2.setup.misc
Article #152

Re: 60ns and 70ns SIMMS in the same computer with Warp?

#152
From: Ted Quade
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 1996 00:00
50 lines
3103 bytes
I'll add my voice. The two quoted sources are incorrect. Mixed memeory speed
is not a problem as long as the slowest memory access time is honored with
the appropriate number of wait states.

T. Quade
B.A.Sc., MSc., P.Eng.


In <Pine.A32.3.91.960420165803.51803A@black.weeg.uiowa.edu>, "Scott R. Eliason" <seliason@blue.weeg.uiowa.edu> writes:
>On 20 Apr 1996 John@.MISSING-HOST-NAME. wrote:
>
>[snip snip snip]
>
>> Now hear this. OS/2, W95, and even the mighty UNIX, have absolutely no
>> idea what the speed of the memory is. They don't care, it matters not at all,
>> and anyone who says that the OS knows, or cares, is wrong. Plain and 
>> simple!
>> 
>[snip]
>
>Hmmmm..., I may be getting into this thread a bit late, but
>if this issue is so "plain and simple" then why do some 
>authorities disagree with you in print?  For example, the authors of 
>_OS/2 Warp Unleashed_ state, "A Trap 0002 almost always indicates a 
>problem exists with the physical memory.  The most common causes are 
>single inline memory modules (SIMMs) that are not the same speed..." (P. 
>943)  Unless I'm missing something here, your statement is entirely at 
>odds with this statement as well as others.  Another example can be found 
>in the _User's Guide to OS/2 Warp_, which comes with Warp itself and is 
>published by IBM.  Here, on p. 175 the author's explain that a Trap 0002 
>error can be due to mismatched SIMMs that operated at different speeds.
>
>You go on to say:
>
>> have we got it now? Mix the speeds. faster won't hurt! No OS on the planet
>> can determine ram access speed! No OS cares!
>> 
>
>Well, it seems that at least from two sources, you are overstating the 
>case.  The OS may not "care" (whatever that means), but according to 
>these sources it may get tripped up in accessing memory from SIMMs of 
>different speeds.
>
>===========================================================================
>     Scott R. Eliason                    Email:  scott-eliason@uiowa.edu
>     Department of Sociology           
>     University of Iowa
>
>       
>
Technical Details
Message-ID: <4lk5q7$oel@udevdiv.Unibase.COM>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <4kecjv$fsl@geraldo.cc.utexas.edu> <4khecg$3g8e@news-s01.ny.us.ibm.net> <4kk4tf$ksq@news.aros.net> <4kq5f0$ehl@usenet6.interramp.com> <4l82km$4ah@cabell.vcu.edu> <4l9eei$gil@news.aros.net> <Pine.A32.3.91.960420165803.51803A@black.weeg.uiowa.edu>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 10ee4f,d82d6820978e5010
X-Google-Attributes: gid10ee4f,public
X-Google-Thread: 10cd94,d82d6820978e5010
X-Google-Attributes: gid10cd94,public
X-Google-Thread: f4337,d82d6820978e5010
X-Google-Attributes: gidf4337,public
X-Google-Thread: 10c4f5,d82d6820978e5010
X-Google-Attributes: gid10c4f5,public
From: tquade@thud.unibase.com (Ted Quade)
Subject: Re: 60ns and 70ns SIMMS in the same computer with Warp?
Date: 1996/04/24
Message-ID: <4lk5q7$oel@udevdiv.Unibase.COM>
X-Deja-AN: 151088758
references: <4kecjv$fsl@geraldo.cc.utexas.edu> <4khecg$3g8e@news-s01.ny.us.ibm.net> <4kk4tf$ksq@news.aros.net> <4kq5f0$ehl@usenet6.interramp.com> <4l82km$4ah@cabell.vcu.edu> <4l9eei$gil@news.aros.net> <Pine.A32.3.91.960420165803.51803A@black.weeg.uiowa.edu>
organization: Ted Quade at home
reply-to: tquade@thud.unibase.com (Ted Quade)
newsgroups: comp.os.os2.setup.misc,comp.os.os2.bugs,bit.listserv.os2-l,alt.org.team-os2