Article View: comp.os.os2.setup.misc
Article #152Re: 60ns and 70ns SIMMS in the same computer with Warp?
From: Ted Quade
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 1996 00:00
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 1996 00:00
50 lines
3103 bytes
3103 bytes
I'll add my voice. The two quoted sources are incorrect. Mixed memeory speed is not a problem as long as the slowest memory access time is honored with the appropriate number of wait states. T. Quade B.A.Sc., MSc., P.Eng. In <Pine.A32.3.91.960420165803.51803A@black.weeg.uiowa.edu>, "Scott R. Eliason" <seliason@blue.weeg.uiowa.edu> writes: >On 20 Apr 1996 John@.MISSING-HOST-NAME. wrote: > >[snip snip snip] > >> Now hear this. OS/2, W95, and even the mighty UNIX, have absolutely no >> idea what the speed of the memory is. They don't care, it matters not at all, >> and anyone who says that the OS knows, or cares, is wrong. Plain and >> simple! >> >[snip] > >Hmmmm..., I may be getting into this thread a bit late, but >if this issue is so "plain and simple" then why do some >authorities disagree with you in print? For example, the authors of >_OS/2 Warp Unleashed_ state, "A Trap 0002 almost always indicates a >problem exists with the physical memory. The most common causes are >single inline memory modules (SIMMs) that are not the same speed..." (P. >943) Unless I'm missing something here, your statement is entirely at >odds with this statement as well as others. Another example can be found >in the _User's Guide to OS/2 Warp_, which comes with Warp itself and is >published by IBM. Here, on p. 175 the author's explain that a Trap 0002 >error can be due to mismatched SIMMs that operated at different speeds. > >You go on to say: > >> have we got it now? Mix the speeds. faster won't hurt! No OS on the planet >> can determine ram access speed! No OS cares! >> > >Well, it seems that at least from two sources, you are overstating the >case. The OS may not "care" (whatever that means), but according to >these sources it may get tripped up in accessing memory from SIMMs of >different speeds. > >=========================================================================== > Scott R. Eliason Email: scott-eliason@uiowa.edu > Department of Sociology > University of Iowa > > >
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4lk5q7$oel@udevdiv.Unibase.COM>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<4kecjv$fsl@geraldo.cc.utexas.edu> <4khecg$3g8e@news-s01.ny.us.ibm.net> <4kk4tf$ksq@news.aros.net> <4kq5f0$ehl@usenet6.interramp.com> <4l82km$4ah@cabell.vcu.edu> <4l9eei$gil@news.aros.net> <Pine.A32.3.91.960420165803.51803A@black.weeg.uiowa.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10ee4f,d82d6820978e5010 X-Google-Attributes: gid10ee4f,public X-Google-Thread: 10cd94,d82d6820978e5010 X-Google-Attributes: gid10cd94,public X-Google-Thread: f4337,d82d6820978e5010 X-Google-Attributes: gidf4337,public X-Google-Thread: 10c4f5,d82d6820978e5010 X-Google-Attributes: gid10c4f5,public From: tquade@thud.unibase.com (Ted Quade) Subject: Re: 60ns and 70ns SIMMS in the same computer with Warp? Date: 1996/04/24 Message-ID: <4lk5q7$oel@udevdiv.Unibase.COM> X-Deja-AN: 151088758 references: <4kecjv$fsl@geraldo.cc.utexas.edu> <4khecg$3g8e@news-s01.ny.us.ibm.net> <4kk4tf$ksq@news.aros.net> <4kq5f0$ehl@usenet6.interramp.com> <4l82km$4ah@cabell.vcu.edu> <4l9eei$gil@news.aros.net> <Pine.A32.3.91.960420165803.51803A@black.weeg.uiowa.edu> organization: Ted Quade at home reply-to: tquade@thud.unibase.com (Ted Quade) newsgroups: comp.os.os2.setup.misc,comp.os.os2.bugs,bit.listserv.os2-l,alt.org.team-os2