🚀 go-pugleaf

In <4l9eei$gil@news.aros.net>, John Brush@aros.net writes:
>
>I don't know who wrote this statement, and it really doesn't matter. However,
>I am getting way sick of people who do not know have a clue 
>making assumptions and giving the impression that they know what
>they are talking about.
>
>Anyone who tells you that you can't mix speeds (meaning a 60ns in place of
>a 70ns) is a bigger liar than the person who fits the above scenario. If your
>motherboard and bios supports 70ns RAM, you can put 10ns Ram in those 
>slots and the system won't give a rat's ass! If you put a SLOWER device in,
>then you have a potential problem.
>
>Now for the corny line. I design embedded controllers and computer systems
>and I know what I am talking about. Challenge me, flame me, I don't care.
>I do know what I a talking about in this area. Can't we all just get along?
>
>Thank you.
>
>Regards,
>
>John

Hi John,

I am so happy. May be you can respond this old old old question that I have in my 
mind since about 5 years...

If we take a Pentium 100Mhz, and try to found it speed in nano seconds, am I right 
if a use this formula:

	frequency =1 / period

so,

	period = 1 / frequency

means

	period = 1 / 100 Mhz (100 000 000 hertz)

equal

	0.000 000 010 seconds

means

	10 nano seconds !!!

Since we know that a Pentium 100Mhz actualy reach that speed internally, and 
in my case, on my mother board, the clock of the PCI and data bus is actualy 
running at the speed of 66Mhz, how can a Pentium 100 Mhz (66Mhz external) can
access those 60-70 nano seconds chips, at 0 WAIT STATE ! ! ? ? ! !

[=======================================
[ Yves Boisjoly
[ OS/2 Team.
[ E-Mail: boisjol@ibm.net
[ Phone:  (514) 522-5079
[=======================================