🚀 go-pugleaf

NT handles the job quite well. Unfortunately, most environments are not as
well versed in NT and have had many problems with it. Our environment uses
NT and RAS for all purposes. We have a mix of NT40, Citrix and older WINDD
servers and they all run fine. We have telnet installed for a remote command
line prompt.

The RAS server I have been using personally has been up for 2 years. It did
not have a major problem until I attempted to install Suns NFS program. It
is not written well and causes problems with the system. So I use
Chameleon's NFS server instead.


Again if you want ease of administration and access to more applications,
don't let anyone fool you. Microsoft is not on top because their product is
inferior, the only complaints come from people who have little, limited or
no experience with the environment.

And to prove it, most people cannot tell how to shut the GUI down and just
run the server with less overhead.

I love my Sparc's but they are slower than my NT boxes.

For all you wanna be flamers - I have 3/60's, 4/260's, 4/280's, IPC's, Sparc
2's, and Sparc 5's in my inventory. So keep you flames in your pocket for
someone who does not know SunOS / Solaris.

Tai ( When the fix all the OS'es we'll be out of a job ) Wyatt


PJ wrote in message <35bc3bf5.0@ruby.hknet.com>...
>here is my question...
>We use Windows95 to dial-up our ISPs and then make an connection (PPP) to
>the UNIX server in the ISP, right?
>So, why always UNIX??  Not NT 4.0 server? Can NT handle this job? if yes,
>why not ISP use NT instead?
>
>