Article View: comp.protocols.iso
Article #184Re: Upper layers security
From: Christian Huitema
Date: Thu, 06 Jul 1989 07:51
Date: Thu, 06 Jul 1989 07:51
17 lines
1350 bytes
1350 bytes
You should distinguish between encipherment, which is basically a transmission function aiming at a particular quality of service, i.e. confidentiality, and signatures, which are clearly dependent of end users interaction, thus located in the application layer. In principle, the same application could run either in encrypted or plain mode without much consequences. After all, confidentiality of the transmission could be provided by many other means, e.g. miliotary guarded shielded cables; usage of end to end encryption appears to me very much the same as using end to end checksum, i.e. a particular transport function that is applied when one does not trust the network. The tricky point of the application layer signature or encryption mechanisms is that they should be based on the ``abstract syntax'' of the data. There is one approach in X.500. Christian Huitema
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<8907060751.AA15159@jerry.inria.fr>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!MIRSA.INRIA.FR!Christian.HuitemaReferences:
<6381.8907050928@ralph.topexp.co.uk>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!MIRSA.INRIA.FR!Christian.Huitema From: Christian.Huitema@MIRSA.INRIA.FR (Christian Huitema) Newsgroups: comp.protocols.iso Subject: Re: Upper layers security Message-ID: <8907060751.AA15159@jerry.inria.fr> Date: 6 Jul 89 07:51:35 GMT References: <6381.8907050928@ralph.topexp.co.uk> Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Organization: The Internet Lines: 17