🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.protocols.iso
Article #185

Lower layer security (Was Re: Upper layers security)

#185
From: B.SZABLAK
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 1989 18:14
5 lines
810 bytes
There has been mention about encrypting data transmissions at lower layers
(e.g. between transport and network), and I thought I would ask the
experts to comment on the extent to which encrypting the PCI (assumed to
be easily guessed by the interceptor of the communication) compromises the
security of the encryption.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <689@lzaz.ATT.COM>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!att!lzaz!bds
References: <6381.8907050928@ralph.topexp.co.uk> <8907060751.AA15159@jerry.inria.fr>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!att!lzaz!bds
From: bds@lzaz.ATT.COM (B.SZABLAK)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.iso,sci.crypt
Subject: Lower layer security (Was Re: Upper layers security)
Summary: Does encrypting protocol information compromise the encryption?
Message-ID: <689@lzaz.ATT.COM>
Date: 12 Jul 89 18:14:03 GMT
References: <6381.8907050928@ralph.topexp.co.uk> <8907060751.AA15159@jerry.inria.fr>
Organization: AT&T ISL Lincroft NJ USA
Lines: 5