Fakerscope 3000 vs. Network Probe 6630

Thread View: comp.protocols.misc

1 messages

[T] Back to Threads [V] Tree View [G] Group Articles

1 total messages Started by Charles Lambert Wed, 21 Sep 1988 15:40

#843

Author: Charles Lambert
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 1988 15:40

14 lines
1019 bytes

I am considering buying either a Fakerscope 3000 or a Network Probe 6630 to
diagnose communication problems.  The system under test uses an in-house
packet protocol carried by RS232 and RS422 links.  We need to capture and
inspect packets, ideally up to 256 characters long,  and occasionally to
synthesise such packets so that we can emulate a communicating unit.

Has anyone used either or both of these instruments?  Can you give me a
comparative assessment?

Send e-mail to cl@datlog.co.uk or {backbone site}!ukc!datlog!cl and I will
post a summary.

----------
Charlie

Thread Navigation

This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.

Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.

Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.

Back to All Threads