Article View: comp.protocols.ppp
Article #164Re: Broadcast over SLIP
From: Clark B. Wierda
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 1992 01:42
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 1992 01:42
9 lines
1173 bytes
1173 bytes
Thanks for the info. I wouldn't call either method 'good' or 'bad'. Each has certain advantages and problems. The lack of broadcast is a very minor point to me. The simpler routing administration required is much more important -- Clark B. Wierda Phone: 501-324-6391 Federal Office Building, Room 2301 Internet: cbwierda@ar14darlrk.er.usgs.gov Little Rock, AR 72201
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<CBWIERDA.92Sep30204227@ar14darlrk.er.usgs.gov>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!usc!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!cbwierdaReferences:
<9209290818.AA23777@ar14darlrk.er.usgs.gov> <9209291627.AA01593@volitans.morningstar.com> <5b773038.1bc5b@pisa.citi.umich.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.ppp Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!usc!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!cbwierda From: cbwierda@ar14darlrk.er.usgs.gov (Clark B. Wierda) Subject: Re: Broadcast over SLIP Organization: US Geological Survey, WRD, Arkansas District In-Reply-To: rees@pisa.citi.umich.edu's message of Tue, 29 Sep 1992 21:41:12 GMT References: <9209290818.AA23777@ar14darlrk.er.usgs.gov> <9209291627.AA01593@volitans.morningstar.com> <5b773038.1bc5b@pisa.citi.umich.edu> Message-ID: <CBWIERDA.92Sep30204227@ar14darlrk.er.usgs.gov> Reply-To: cbwierda@ar14darlrk.er.usgs.gov Sender: nobody@ctr.columbia.edu Date: Thu, 1 Oct 1992 01:42:27 GMT X-Posted-From: ar14darlrk.er.usgs.gov NNTP-Posting-Host: sol.ctr.columbia.edu Lines: 9