Article View: comp.protocols.ppp
Article #335Re: PPPoE marketing
From: John Loop
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2001 03:10
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2001 03:10
55 lines
3307 bytes
3307 bytes
Are we talking about Redback here, ..ah I think they were the early
proponent of pppoE [correct me Jeff and James]. Why didn't Redback
market their ..other.. great approach discussed here?
Still not sure I get it!
John
Jeff Mcadams wrote:
>
> Thus spake Andrew Sun
> >It's called marketing, and the {A}DSL providers bought it, hook, line,
> >and sinker.
>
> Bingo.
>
> >Many advantages of PPPoE are a marketing illusion. Much of which can
> >be implemented with technically better alternatives. Multiple
> >sessions? Allocate another IP address.
>
> Or use a different tunneling protocol.
>
> >From this users point of view, PPPoE is a real nuisance.
>
> >It emulates dial-up service in this day and age when internet service
> >should be always on.
>
> Heh...you want the ultimate user nuisance experience provided by a LEC?
> Check out Cincinnati Bell's Zoomtown DSL service. Good grief. If
> you've experienced this abomination, then this is enough said...if you
> haven't...be glad you're only dealing with PPPoE crap.
>
> >At least there exist competing cable-tv internet service providers who
> >can provide the more desirable, unaltered ethernet connectivity.
>
> BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>
> You're serious about saying there are cable-tv providers providing
> "unaltered ... connectivity?" What a joke!
>
> >As for some of the ADSL providers out there, still too little (and it's
> >PPPoE), too late, and for too many dollars. Competition is a good
> >thing.
>
> There are those of us out there that are providing Internet Access over
> DSL, and doing so in a sane, well thought out way...unfortunately, I
> fear we are way too few and far between.
>
> >(Gee, I hope my rantings can make a difference) Just another author's
> >opinion. . .
>
> Preach it brother.
> --
> Jeff McAdams Email: jeffm@iglou.com
> Head Network Administrator Voice: (502) 966-3848
> IgLou Internet Services (800) 436-4456
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3A89F72A.4654847E@bellsouth.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!supernews.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!news.gv.tsc.tdk.com!falcon.america.net!newsfeed.atl!news1.atl.POSTED!not-for-mailReferences:
<3A87F5AB.7592D38E@snt.bst.bls.com> <xoav8znc3q4u.fsf@sun.com> <3A89379A.8B36DAED@snt.bst.bls.com> <3A893B93.17F31E44@ufl.edu> <xoavn1bqfzqr.fsf@sun.com> <3A895280.E17C1505@snt.bst.bls.com> <3a89b546$1_3@news.iglou.com> <3A89C801.EE17C245@bellsouth.net> <3A89DFF4.7868536D@home.com> <3a89e850$1_2@news.iglou.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103eaf,8bcec72c5c695208 X-Google-Attributes: gid103eaf,public X-Google-Thread: 1122a6,8bcec72c5c695208 X-Google-Attributes: gid1122a6,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-02-13 19:13:47 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!supernews.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!news.gv.tsc.tdk.com!falcon.america.net!newsfeed.atl!news1.atl.POSTED!not-for-mail Message-ID: <3A89F72A.4654847E@bellsouth.net> From: John Loop <jdloop@bellsouth.net> X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en]C-bls40 (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.protocols.ppp,bellsouth.net.support.adsl Subject: Re: PPPoE marketing References: <3A87F5AB.7592D38E@snt.bst.bls.com> <xoav8znc3q4u.fsf@sun.com> <3A89379A.8B36DAED@snt.bst.bls.com> <3A893B93.17F31E44@ufl.edu> <xoavn1bqfzqr.fsf@sun.com> <3A895280.E17C1505@snt.bst.bls.com> <3a89b546$1_3@news.iglou.com> <3A89C801.EE17C245@bellsouth.net> <3A89DFF4.7868536D@home.com> <3a89e850$1_2@news.iglou.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 55 Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 22:10:34 -0500 NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.152.56.40 X-Trace: news1.atl 982120307 205.152.56.40 (Tue, 13 Feb 2001 22:11:47 EST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 22:11:47 EST