🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.protocols.ppp
Article #360

Re: Using NFS over dialup Lines (SLIP/PPP)

#360
From: Mike Skrydlak
Date: Wed, 08 Jan 1992 17:46
38 lines
2678 bytes
In article <1992Jan7.072754.10321@cbfsb.att.com> eajjs@cbnewsf.cb.att.com (john.
sottile) writes:
>We tuned NFS via the /etc/fstab options to use a retrans=300,
>rsize=4096,wsize=4096.
>Retransmission  = 300 tenths of a second (30 Seconds).  This is a bit

------------
Don't you mean 'timeo=300' ?
I believe default timeo=7 (7/10 sec) & default retrans=3 (3 retransmissions).

We have people mounting over 56k, T1, Ethernet, & faster. We have no control
or warning as to what who is going to do when, and to whom.  ;-)

I read something somewhere (I thought it was a Sun man page on 'mount') &
tried what they said in a lab with various conditions. I found that :

'rsize=1024 wsize=1024 timeo=30 (3 seconds) retrans=5'

worked fine - we suffered little performance loss in good (eg, clean ethernet)
situations while still allowing things to work in bad (marginal 56k links)
situations. I recommended this to everyone in my company that I could get to,
& some even listened to me. We've had very few calls since.

I am not an expert at this, & this was by no means a 'good scientific study'.
But it was all I had time for, & it sure seemed to work.

ps: I sure appreciate that recommendation of the O'Reilly book, we're going
    to order one.

pps: It looked to me that rsize & wsize < 1256 (or there abouts) would allow
    enough room for ip/udp/nfs headers & still stay within ONE ethernet packet
    (MTU). 1024 was a NICE figure that was < 1256. The default 8k can result
    in a fast system rapid-firing out 6 ethernet packets, which in a non-perfect
    environment, may NOT all get through. IF one or more packets don't get
    ALL the way to the other process, then ALL 6 packets get rapid-fired again,
    & the cycle MAY repeat (until RPC timeout error).
    At least it looked that way to me. Again, I'm just a network grunt, so what
    do I know ? Don't answer that !! ;-)
Technical Details
Message-ID: <19875@zephyr.ens.tek.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zephyr.ens.tek.com!cascade.ens.tek.com!mikes
References: <1992Jan7.072754.10321@cbfsb.att.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: fa2d8,b748aa9d1e11c7fe
X-Google-Attributes: gidfa2d8,public
X-Google-Thread: 103eaf,b748aa9d1e11c7fe
X-Google-Attributes: gid103eaf,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1992-01-08 09:54:28 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zephyr.ens.tek.com!cascade.ens.tek.com!mikes
From: mikes@cascade.ens.tek.com (Mike Skrydlak)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.ppp,biz.comp.telebit
Subject: Re: Using NFS over dialup Lines (SLIP/PPP)
Keywords: NFS SLIP PPP NETBLAZER T3000
Message-ID: <19875@zephyr.ens.tek.com>
Date: 8 Jan 92 17:46:47 GMT
References: <1992Jan7.072754.10321@cbfsb.att.com>
Sender: news@zephyr.ens.tek.com
Followup-To: comp.protocols.ppp
Organization: Tektronix, Inc., Beaverton,  OR.
Lines: 39