Article View: comp.security.misc
Article #799Re: Mail forging
From: Michael G Koopman
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 03:07
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 03:07
42 lines
2831 bytes
2831 bytes
As a user not aware of many security issues since I have real work to do and almost a life therefore not enough time to read this newsgroup - OOPS gotta go..... If I recall where this began correctly the original issue concerned mail forgery by a cracker requesting that a user change her password. A site at which user's will naively change passwords based on an e-mail message has not kept up on enlightenment of the users. Any user should verify such a message in some way before acting on it. Naive users may be a system administrators worst security risk. By following this track it seems obvious that sys admins may consider more layers of faulty security code the right thing. As a user at my company I feel obliged to poke my head out of the foxhole to see if someone is coming, once in a while, at least. When "funny" things happen here the system administration is informed. The administrators need to have the experience to recognize which curiousities show the greatest potential for revealing security holes. There is more than one benefit to teaching users to "pester" root about unexpected occurrences. The "funny" things users notice which are not the result of unauthorized access are likely to be the result of user errors. Less user errors mean more productive systems which means sys admins get raises, right? Well, in a perfect world .... Make your users your allies. If your users know how the box is supposed to act they can tell you when it isn't doing what it should which ~might~ help flag impropriety. If the box (user activities included) is acting as it is supposed to act isn't the sys admin doing 90% of her job right, anyway? That additional 10% as deputy sheriff is just to prove you hate those bad guys, anyway. In the U.S. isn't the FBI supposed to keep the lines free from wiretaps and the like (with all of us good citizens' help, of course)? If you have significant security risks, e.g. interpol records, what the Henry Ford are you doing on publicly accessible nets? IMHO -- Mike Koopman Concurrent Technologies Corporation phone: +1-814-269-2637 1450 Scalp Avenue telefax: +1-814-269-2666 Johnstown, PA 15904 e-mail: koopman@server1.ctc.com
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<9937@blue.cis.pitt.edu.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pitt.edu!mgkst1References:
<4225@bcstec.ca.boeing.com> <BxrJCL.9sC@mtholyoke.edu> <PC123.92Nov15191454@bootes.cus.cam.ac.uk>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pitt.edu!mgkst1 From: mgkst1+@pitt.edu (Michael G Koopman) Newsgroups: comp.security.misc Subject: Re: Mail forging Summary: Informed users are your best security investment Keywords: mail, user awareness Message-ID: <9937@blue.cis.pitt.edu.UUCP> Date: 20 Nov 92 03:07:09 GMT References: <4225@bcstec.ca.boeing.com> <BxrJCL.9sC@mtholyoke.edu> <PC123.92Nov15191454@bootes.cus.cam.ac.uk> Sender: news+@pitt.edu Followup-To: poster Organization: University of Pittsburgh Lines: 42