Article View: comp.security.misc
Article #863Re: Security vs usefulness (was Re: reasons
From: Paul (Cliffy) Palmer
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 16:27
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 16:27
13 lines
1144 bytes
1144 bytes
In article 1gkpsmINNn05@iraul1.ira.uka.de, s_titz@ira.uka.de (Olaf Titz) writes: >In article <1992Dec14.211255.15839@lambda.msfc.nasa.gov> palmer@Trade_Zone.msfc.nasa.gov writes: > ^^^^^^^^ >You see that the following applies largely to government/military only? Please do not do me the disservice of discounting my statements simply because I happen to have sent my message from a NASA provided host. My statements apply just as well to the purely commercial organizations I have worked for that have a vested interest in maintaining the integrity of their computers. --- Paul (Cliffy) Palmer
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Dec15.162703.3216@lambda.msfc.nasa.gov>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!gumby!destroyer!lambda.msfc.nasa.gov!newsReferences:
<1gkpsmINNn05@iraul1.ira.uka.de>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.security.misc Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!gumby!destroyer!lambda.msfc.nasa.gov!news From: palmer@Trade_Zone.msfc.nasa.gov (Paul (Cliffy) Palmer) Subject: Re: Security vs usefulness (was Re: reasons Message-ID: <1992Dec15.162703.3216@lambda.msfc.nasa.gov> Sender: news@lambda.msfc.nasa.gov (Newsmaster) Nntp-Posting-Host: isabella.msfc.nasa.gov Reply-To: palmer@Trade_Zone.msfc.nasa.gov Organization: New Technology, Inc. References: <1gkpsmINNn05@iraul1.ira.uka.de> Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 16:27:03 GMT Lines: 14