🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.software.year-2000
Article #26

Re: Chernobyling

#26
From: Sean Ennis
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 1998 00:00
46 lines
3095 bytes
In article <6aiov3$ibt$1@news.bconnex.net>, "DEW" <caper@bconnex.net> wrote:
] Date: Mon, 26 Jan 1998 14:38:57 -0500
] 
] Driving home one recent night I heard a CBC radio program on Three Mile
] Island. I was surprised to learn how out-of-control the plant was. 

Personaly I think it's mostly the fault of a bad design.  If I recall
correctly - the Canadian designed reactors (CanDu?) had the benefit of
shutting down in the even of a catastrophic coolent loss.  The 
French/American/Russian designs tended not to do do this... infact they
tended to get much worse.

[..]
] It was disturbing to
] hear that the same problem had occurred shortly before at another American
] reactor but management types had suppressed information about the occurrence
] and how to avoid it at other sites.

Yah... don't tie/chain control valves in on position (3 Mile) don't do 
f*cking 'experiments' with a comertial reactor (Chernobile(sp?)).

] Before hearing the program I thought that the worse the year 2000 mess might
] bring could be a bit worse than what folks had suffered between 1929 and
] 1950. I read about power problems but most mentioned shutdowns and
] blackouts. The radio program made me think hard about nuclear reactors.

I'm not particularily concerned about it.  I would suggest that logging
programs might have trouble (much like the Air Traffic Control systems - the
ATC screens really don't "care" about the date - they just give you the 
current situation).  But I don't think that control systems will have a 
problem.  Most of the time, if the computers detect a big change/anomally
the trip-out the reactor, and put it in a shut down state.  Failing that,
there's _always_ operators around... and unlike the "China-Syndrom" (What a
farse) operators do tap their guages before trusting the readings.

I'm told that it's not 'hard' to shut a reactor down... but it may be a
bitch to bring her back up (i.e. it could take a couple days).

Sean

-+-
Sean Ennis <sennnis@escape.ca>

My email address has been munged to prevent spam.  Take off the first
'S' and it should reach me.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <gUbz.3$Uh1.13072@typhoon.mbnet.mb.ca>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <6aiov3$ibt$1@news.bconnex.net>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f504b,89ec2381c18aadad
X-Google-Attributes: gidf504b,public
X-Google-Thread: fc3d0,89ec2381c18aadad
X-Google-Attributes: gidfc3d0,public
X-Google-Thread: f86b3,89ec2381c18aadad
X-Google-Attributes: gidf86b3,public
X-Google-Thread: f7b9c,89ec2381c18aadad
X-Google-Attributes: gidf7b9c,public
X-Google-Thread: f67a2,89ec2381c18aadad
X-Google-Attributes: gidf67a2,public
X-Google-Thread: 106cdd,89ec2381c18aadad
X-Google-Attributes: gid106cdd,public
X-Google-Thread: 112f74,89ec2381c18aadad
X-Google-Attributes: gid112f74,public
From: sennis@escape.ca (Sean Ennis)
Subject: Re: Chernobyling
Date: 1998/01/27
Message-ID: <gUbz.3$Uh1.13072@typhoon.mbnet.mb.ca>
X-Deja-AN: 319543780
References: <6aiov3$ibt$1@news.bconnex.net>
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 26 Jan 1998 20:46:36 CST
Newsgroups: comp.software.year-2000,can.general,ont.general,ns.general,man.general,ab.general,bc.general