Article View: comp.sources.d
Article #1742Re: v01INF1: Status - Status of comp.sources.reviewed
From: Jay Maynard
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 1991 14:58
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 1991 14:58
19 lines
1461 bytes
1461 bytes
In article <12409:Apr1513:14:4591@kramden.acf.nyu.edu> brnstnd@kramden.acf.nyu.edu (Dan Bernstein) writes:
>You have the right to your beliefs. Just don't pretend that this has
>anything to do with journal publication.
One more time:
*WHAT* *DIFFERENCE* *DOES* *IT* *MAKE*??!
The guidelines as discussed here match what the proposal (which you apparently
didn't read beyond the point where it said that it was *MODELED* on journal
publication) that was voted on said in all material points.
Why can't you drop the subject until we get some actual examples of the process
inaction?
--
Jay Maynard, EMT-P, K5ZC, PP-ASEL | Never ascribe to malice that which can
jmaynard@thesis1.med.uth.tmc.edu | adequately be explained by stupidity.
"X.400 is the mail system of the future, and I hope it stays that way."
-- Erik E. Fair
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4967@lib.tmc.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!bcm!lib!thesis1.med.uth.tmc.eduReferences:
<6787:Apr1420:38:3991@kramden.acf.nyu.edu> <1991Apr14.232818.15851@athena.mit.edu> <12409:Apr1513:14:4591@kramden.acf.nyu.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!bcm!lib!thesis1.med.uth.tmc.edu From: jmaynard@thesis1.med.uth.tmc.edu (Jay Maynard) Newsgroups: comp.sources.d Subject: Re: v01INF1: Status - Status of comp.sources.reviewed Message-ID: <4967@lib.tmc.edu> Date: 15 Apr 91 14:58:43 GMT References: <6787:Apr1420:38:3991@kramden.acf.nyu.edu> <1991Apr14.232818.15851@athena.mit.edu> <12409:Apr1513:14:4591@kramden.acf.nyu.edu> Sender: usenet@lib.tmc.edu Organization: University of Texas Medical School at Houston Lines: 19 Nntp-Posting-Host: thesis1.med.uth.tmc.edu