🚀 go-pugleaf

Re: proposal: renew & relocator member fn
By: Tony Cook on Tue, 20 Feb 1996 23:22

Re: #warning
By: Jonathan de Boyne Pollard on Tue, 20 Feb 1996 23:20

Re: standardizing routines without main()
By: fjh on Wed, 21 Feb 1996 10:43

Re: Legal C++ code?
By: Don Wallace on Tue, 20 Feb 1996 15:44

Re: Article for comp.std.c++: Eliminating #ifdef: if const
By: mtr on Tue, 20 Feb 1996 15:44

Re: typedef not strong
By: Robert Payne on Tue, 20 Feb 1996 15:44

Public Comments
By: Don Organ on Tue, 20 Feb 1996 23:33

Re: pointer conversions from the null pointer
By: Steve Clamage on Tue, 20 Feb 1996 21:32

Re: Correctness of compilers behavior
By: Steve Clamage on Tue, 20 Feb 1996 21:42

Re: #warning
By: Steve Clamage on Tue, 20 Feb 1996 21:13

Re: Problem with template overloading
By: Steve Clamage on Tue, 20 Feb 1996 21:13

Re: New ANSI C++ working paper
By: Steve Clamage on Tue, 20 Feb 1996 05:55

Re: Standard string class
By: J. Kanze on Tue, 20 Feb 1996 05:41

Re: Numeric literal formats
By: James Kanze US/ESC 60/3/141 #407... on Tue, 20 Feb 1996 05:50

The realloc question: rationale?
By: Kerry Kimbrough on Tue, 20 Feb 1996 05:39

RE: Portability. Modules. WAS: RE: Are all Windows programs ill-formed?
By: Eugene Lazutkin on Tue, 20 Feb 1996 07:20

RE: Portability. Modules. WAS: RE: Are all Windows programs ill-formed?
By: Eugene Lazutkin on Tue, 20 Feb 1996 07:15

Re: STL
By: Cynosure Computer Tech on Tue, 20 Feb 1996 06:37

Re: proposal: renew & relocator member fn
By: devitto on Tue, 20 Feb 1996 05:48

Re: typedef not strong
By: Fergus Henderson on Tue, 20 Feb 1996 04:56

Re: Article for comp.std.c++: Eliminating #ifdef: if const
By: Shankar Unni on Mon, 19 Feb 1996 23:16

Re: Time representations
By: Max TenEyck Woodbury on Mon, 19 Feb 1996 23:16

Re: Observations on templates
By: David Vandevoorde on Mon, 12 Feb 1996 15:07

Re: Observations on templates
By: David Vandevoorde on Fri, 09 Feb 1996 04:07

Re: class.union questions
By: Dirk Becker on Sat, 10 Feb 1996 15:39

Re: Observations on templates
By: Jason Merrill on Thu, 08 Feb 1996 22:30

Re: #ifdef XXXX
By: Michael Cook on Sat, 10 Feb 1996 08:50

Re: Are all Windows programs ill-formed?
By: J. Kanze on Sat, 10 Feb 1996 09:11

Re: An STL helper -- and template and type shenanigans
By: J. Kanze on Sat, 10 Feb 1996 09:04

Re: Are all Windows programs ill-formed?
By: J. Kanze on Fri, 09 Feb 1996 17:12

Re: Give operator. a chance
By: J. Kanze on Fri, 09 Feb 1996 15:43

Re: class.union questions
By: J. Kanze on Fri, 09 Feb 1996 15:41

Re: auto_ptr again
By: J. Kanze on Fri, 09 Feb 1996 15:40

Re: basic_string& operator=(const basic_string&)
By: James Kanze US/ESC 60/3/141 #407... on Thu, 08 Feb 1996 16:30

auto_ptr idioms
By: Greg Colvin on Thu, 08 Feb 1996 18:10

Nesting scope resolution
By: Nathan Sidwell on Sat, 10 Feb 1996 05:01

Re: and, or, not
By: Andrew Koenig on Thu, 08 Feb 1996 23:58

Re: Throwing an exception from within a signal handler
By: Dick Menninger on Thu, 08 Feb 1996 22:45

Re: bool
By: Dag Bruck on Wed, 07 Feb 1996 15:57

Anyone considered inheritable friendship?
By: Eugene Radchenko on Mon, 12 Feb 1996 16:20

Re: Observations on templates
By: Eugene Radchenko on Thu, 08 Feb 1996 17:00

Re: Are all Windows programs ill-formed?
By: Claus A. Faerber on Wed, 07 Feb 1996 20:31

Re: #ifdef XXXX
By: Jonathan de Boyne Pollard on Mon, 12 Feb 1996 20:54

Re: Anyone considered inheritable friendship?
By: Steve Clamage on Mon, 12 Feb 1996 18:24

Re: Observations on templates
By: Fergus Henderson on Mon, 12 Feb 1996 18:22

Re: Nesting scope resolution
By: Fergus Henderson on Mon, 12 Feb 1996 08:02

Re: Observations on templates
By: Fergus Henderson on Mon, 12 Feb 1996 05:03

Re: Are all Windows programs ill-formed?
By: Mike Enright on Mon, 12 Feb 1996 18:20

Re: Observations on templates
By: Pulkkinen Esa on Mon, 12 Feb 1996 18:16

Re: Throwing an exception from within a signal handler
By: Tom Payne on Fri, 09 Feb 1996 23:33

Re: Are all Windows programs ill-formed?
By: Joe Buck on Fri, 09 Feb 1996 19:10

Re: proposal: renew & relocator member fn
By: john (j.d.) hickin on Sat, 10 Feb 1996 08:35

Re: casting and virtual inheritence
By: jodle on Fri, 09 Feb 1996 15:38

Re: Give operator. a chance
By: Jerry Coffin on Fri, 09 Feb 1996 00:18

Re: #ifdef XXXX
By: John R. Williams on Thu, 08 Feb 1996 23:57

Re: casting and virtual inheritence
By: David Sachs on Thu, 08 Feb 1996 22:56

Re: Make type_info name() distinct?
By: Ajay Kamdar on Fri, 09 Feb 1996 15:35

Re: deriving from a typedef name
By: Steve Clamage on Thu, 08 Feb 1996 22:31

Re: casting and virtual inheritence
By: Steve Clamage on Fri, 09 Feb 1996 15:33

Re: Inherent C++ problem??
By: Joe Buck on Fri, 09 Feb 1996 02:49

Re: <string> and getline
By: Steve Clamage on Thu, 08 Feb 1996 19:44

Binding a temperary to a non const ref - status of the rules?
By: Helmut Jarausch on Thu, 08 Feb 1996 18:11

Re: Exception spec seems ambigous to me..
By: David Byrden on Thu, 08 Feb 1996 04:40

Re: friend class declaration and nested classe
By: Steve Clamage on Wed, 07 Feb 1996 22:00

Re: and, or, not
By: Steve Clamage on Wed, 07 Feb 1996 21:13

class/object protection
By: Pierfranco Ferronato on Wed, 07 Feb 1996 17:22

Re: basic_string& operator=(const basic_string&
By: Steve Clamage on Wed, 07 Feb 1996 15:57

Re: basic_string& operator=(const basic_string&
By: john (j.d.) hickin on Thu, 08 Feb 1996 10:48

Re: Observations on templates
By: Ken Walter on Wed, 07 Feb 1996 15:57

Re: Cleaning auto_ptr copy semantics.
By: Ken Walter on Tue, 06 Feb 1996 20:59

Re: Are all Windows programs ill-formed?
By: Jerry Coffin on Tue, 06 Feb 1996 19:36

Re: bool
By: John Max Skaller on Fri, 09 Feb 1996 17:10

<string> and getline
By: Adrian Robson on Thu, 08 Feb 1996 16:34

Re: proposal: renew & relocator member fn
By: Dietmar Kuehl on Mon, 12 Feb 1996 07:17

bool
By: bs on Wed, 07 Feb 1996 00:40

Forward declaration of a sub-class?
By: bwmott on Tue, 06 Feb 1996 22:20

Portability. Modules. WAS: RE: Are all Windows programs ill-formed?
By: Eugene Lazutkin on Thu, 08 Feb 1996 17:55

RE: Cleaning auto_ptr copy semantics.
By: Eugene Lazutkin on Thu, 08 Feb 1996 10:51

Re: New ANSI C++ working paper
By: Steve Clamage on Mon, 12 Feb 1996 18:47

Re: New ANSI C++ working paper
By: Pete Forman on Mon, 12 Feb 1996 18:21

GNU coding standards (was: Re: Are all Windows programs ill-formed?)
By: Fergus Henderson on Sat, 10 Feb 1996 16:29

Re: Make type_info name() distinct?
By: Steve Clamage on Sun, 11 Feb 1996 03:20

Re: Make type_info name() distinct?
By: Dirk Becker on Sat, 10 Feb 1996 15:38

Re: auto_ptr again
By: Joe Buck on Wed, 07 Feb 1996 23:00

friend class declaration and nested classes
By: Tilo Koerbs on Wed, 07 Feb 1996 19:35

Re: and, or, not
By: Rod Burman on Wed, 07 Feb 1996 19:34

Re: Const and Non-Const Constructors
By: Fergus Henderson on Wed, 07 Feb 1996 18:25

Re: bool
By: Nathan Myers, http://www.cantrip... on Wed, 07 Feb 1996 03:19

Re: Forward declaration of a sub-class?
By: Steve Clamage on Wed, 07 Feb 1996 01:50

proposal: renew & relocator member fn
By: Gregory Bond on Wed, 07 Feb 1996 03:25

Re: Are all Windows programs ill-formed?
By: Richard Krehbiel on Wed, 07 Feb 1996 03:18

Re: #ifdef XXXX
By: Jerry Coffin on Wed, 07 Feb 1996 01:48

Re: basic_string& operator=(const basic_string&
By: Paul Newson on Wed, 07 Feb 1996 00:47

Re: #ifdef XXXX
By: Ken Walter on Tue, 06 Feb 1996 22:01

Re: Inherent C++ problem??
By: Steve Clamage on Tue, 06 Feb 1996 19:40

Re: Give operator. a chance
By: BAFlorma on Tue, 06 Feb 1996 18:30

basic_string& operator=(const basic_string&)
By: john (j.d.) hickin on Tue, 06 Feb 1996 18:28

Re: class.union questions
By: Fergus Henderson on Tue, 06 Feb 1996 18:27

inconsistance in over.over
By: Alexander Krotoff on Tue, 06 Feb 1996 18:26

RE: Inherent C++ problem??
By: William McIlhagga on Tue, 06 Feb 1996 16:08

Re: hash_XXX containers?
By: Steve Clamage on Tue, 06 Feb 1996 16:07

Re: Cleaning auto_ptr copy semantics.
By: Randal Parsons on Tue, 06 Feb 1996 15:41

Re: #ifdef XXXX
By: Dick Menninger on Mon, 05 Feb 1996 23:31

Re: delete this
By: Nathan Myers, http://www.cantrip... on Mon, 05 Feb 1996 23:30

Re: Observations on templates
By: bs on Mon, 05 Feb 1996 23:30

Exception spec seems ambigous to me..
By: bs on Mon, 05 Feb 1996 23:28

bool
By: Scott Meyers on Mon, 05 Feb 1996 20:23

Re: Give operator. a chance
By: Andrew Koenig on Tue, 06 Feb 1996 14:42

Re: Const and Non-Const Constructors
By: Andrew Koenig on Tue, 06 Feb 1996 14:43

Re: hash_XXX containers?
By: Dick Menninger on Tue, 06 Feb 1996 02:35

Re: and, or, not
By: Steve Clamage on Tue, 06 Feb 1996 02:43

Re: Cleaning auto_ptr copy semantics.
By: Matt Austern on Tue, 06 Feb 1996 02:41

Const and Non-Const Constructors
By: Scott Meyers on Tue, 06 Feb 1996 02:38

Re: class.union questions
By: James Kanze US/ESC 60/3/141 #407... on Tue, 06 Feb 1996 02:35

Re: auto_ptr again
By: James Kanze US/ESC 60/3/141 #407... on Tue, 06 Feb 1996 02:31

Re: Give operator. a chance
By: Claus A. Faerber on Mon, 05 Feb 1996 22:59

Re: and, or, not
By: John Galt on Mon, 05 Feb 1996 19:25

Can one do this in a handler???
By: David Byrden on Mon, 05 Feb 1996 00:09

Re: Cleaning auto_ptr copy semantics.
By: John Max Skaller on Mon, 05 Feb 1996 00:09

Re: Throwing an exception from within a signal handler
By: Tom Payne on Sun, 04 Feb 1996 18:28

Re: Give operator. a chance
By: John Max Skaller on Mon, 05 Feb 1996 17:25

Re: Are all Windows programs ill-formed?
By: Fergus Henderson on Mon, 05 Feb 1996 17:24

Re: An STL helper -- and template and type shenanigans
By: Joe Buck on Mon, 05 Feb 1996 17:22

Re: #ifdef XXXX
By: JKLIER on Sat, 03 Feb 1996 17:17

Re: #ifdef XXXX
By: J. Kanze on Sat, 03 Feb 1996 17:17

Exception spec seems ambigous to me..
By: David Byrden on Sat, 03 Feb 1996 17:17

Re: #ifdef XXXX
By: Fergus Henderson on Sat, 03 Feb 1996 17:17

Re: The type of the this pointer
By: Steve Clamage on Sun, 04 Feb 1996 00:50