🚀 go-pugleaf

Re: Give operator. a chance
By: John Max Skaller on Mon, 05 Feb 1996 17:25

Re: Are all Windows programs ill-formed?
By: Fergus Henderson on Mon, 05 Feb 1996 17:24

Re: An STL helper -- and template and type shenanigans
By: Joe Buck on Mon, 05 Feb 1996 17:22

Re: #ifdef XXXX
By: JKLIER on Sat, 03 Feb 1996 17:17

Re: #ifdef XXXX
By: J. Kanze on Sat, 03 Feb 1996 17:17

Exception spec seems ambigous to me..
By: David Byrden on Sat, 03 Feb 1996 17:17

Re: #ifdef XXXX
By: Fergus Henderson on Sat, 03 Feb 1996 17:17

Re: The type of the this pointer
By: Steve Clamage on Sun, 04 Feb 1996 00:50

Re: Cleaning auto_ptr copy semantics.
By: John Max Skaller on Mon, 05 Feb 1996 17:29

Re: class.union questions
By: John Max Skaller on Mon, 05 Feb 1996 17:27

Re: Observations on templates
By: John Max Skaller on Mon, 05 Feb 1996 17:25

Re: Are all Windows programs ill-formed?
By: John Max Skaller on Mon, 05 Feb 1996 17:26

Re: Make type_info name() distinct?
By: David Vandevoorde on Sat, 03 Feb 1996 23:50

Re: new T[0] and sizeof(T)
By: Steve Clamage on Mon, 05 Feb 1996 17:24

Re: hash_XXX containers?
By: Steve Clamage on Mon, 05 Feb 1996 03:21

Re: Give operator. a chance
By: Dan Holmsand on Mon, 05 Feb 1996 04:00

Re: hash_XXX containers?
By: David Vandevoorde on Mon, 05 Feb 1996 04:09

hash_XXX containers?
By: Eugene Lazutkin on Sun, 04 Feb 1996 06:56

Re: Give operator. a chance
By: John Max Skaller on Sun, 04 Feb 1996 03:39

Re: auto_ptr again
By: john (j.d.) hickin on Sun, 04 Feb 1996 03:33

class.union questions
By: Dirk Becker on Sat, 03 Feb 1996 17:22

Re: new T[0] and sizeof(T)
By: Fergus Henderson on Sat, 03 Feb 1996 14:46

Re: auto_ptr again
By: Joe Buck on Sat, 03 Feb 1996 06:46

Re: An STL helper -- and template and type shenanigans
By: Doug Morgan on Sat, 03 Feb 1996 06:45

RE: Cleaning auto_ptr copy semantics.
By: Eugene Lazutkin on Sat, 03 Feb 1996 06:36

Re: Why no allocator-specific delete?
By: James Kanze US/ESC 60/3/141 #407... on Sat, 03 Feb 1996 04:56

Re: Give operator. a chance
By: James Kanze US/ESC 60/3/141 #407... on Sat, 03 Feb 1996 04:48

Re: #ifdef XXXX
By: Fergus Henderson on Sat, 03 Feb 1996 04:43

Re: Give operator. a chance
By: Fergus Henderson on Sat, 03 Feb 1996 04:41

Re: Are all Windows programs ill-formed?
By: Claude Quezel on Sat, 03 Feb 1996 03:33

Re: #ifdef XXXX
By: Charles F. McDevitt on Sat, 03 Feb 1996 03:45

The type of the this pointer
By: Dawn Koffman on Sat, 03 Feb 1996 03:31

Re: Make type_info name() distinct?
By: Bill Gibbons on Sat, 03 Feb 1996 01:53

Re: Are all Windows programs ill-formed?
By: David Byrden on Fri, 02 Feb 1996 22:00

Re: Cleaning auto_ptr copy semantics.
By: Joe Buck on Fri, 02 Feb 1996 21:54

Re: Time representations
By: Nathan Myers, http://www.cantrip... on Fri, 02 Feb 1996 15:49

Re: U.S. monetary unit.
By: Nathan Myers, http://www.cantrip... on Fri, 02 Feb 1996 15:49

Re: typeinfo
By: steven2 on Fri, 02 Feb 1996 15:49

Re: Are all Windows programs ill-formed?
By: James Kanze US/ESC 60/3/141 #407... on Fri, 02 Feb 1996 15:49

Re: Explicit constructor call vs Temporaries
By: James Kanze US/ESC 60/3/141 #407... on Fri, 02 Feb 1996 15:49

Re: new T[0] and sizeof(T)
By: Fergus Henderson on Fri, 02 Feb 1996 15:49

Re: Explicit constructor call vs Temporaries
By: David Sachs on Thu, 01 Feb 1996 22:54

Re: delete this
By: Steve Clamage on Fri, 02 Feb 1996 01:23

delete this
By: Earl Chew on Fri, 02 Feb 1996 00:01

Re: Give operator. a chance
By: Bjarne Stroustrup on Thu, 01 Feb 1996 22:54

Re: Are all Windows programs ill-formed?
By: Barry Margolin on Thu, 01 Feb 1996 22:54

Re: Explicit constructor call vs Temporaries
By: Matt Austern on Thu, 01 Feb 1996 22:54

Make type_info name() distinct?
By: Dirk Becker on Thu, 01 Feb 1996 22:54

Re: Are all Windows programs ill-formed?
By: Jonathan de Boyne Pollard on Thu, 01 Feb 1996 22:45

FW: FW: FW: Inherent C++ problem?
By: Eugene Lazutkin on Thu, 01 Feb 1996 22:53

Re: Time representations
By: James Kanze US/ESC 60/3/141 #407... on Thu, 01 Feb 1996 22:45

Re: (no subject)
By: James Kanze US/ESC 60/3/141 #407... on Wed, 31 Jan 1996 16:34

Re: Are all Windows programs ill-formed?
By: James Kanze US/ESC 60/3/141 #407... on Wed, 31 Jan 1996 15:50

Re: Time representations
By: Max TenEyck Woodbury on Fri, 02 Feb 1996 05:58

Re: new T[0] and sizeof(T)
By: Steve Clamage on Fri, 02 Feb 1996 01:38

Re: Are all Windows programs ill-formed?
By: Claus Faerber on Thu, 01 Feb 1996 18:14

Re: Explicit constructor call vs Temporaries
By: Tilo Koerbs on Thu, 01 Feb 1996 17:54

Re: Why no allocator-specific delete?
By: Matt Timmermans on Thu, 01 Feb 1996 17:26

Re: An STL helper -- and template and type shenanigans
By: James Kanze US/ESC 60/3/141 #407... on Thu, 01 Feb 1996 17:23

Re: inconsistance in over.over
By: J. Stephen Adamczyk on Thu, 01 Feb 1996 17:22

Re: Time representations
By: Max TenEyck Woodbury on Thu, 01 Feb 1996 17:09

Re: Are all Windows programs ill-formed?
By: Fergus Henderson on Thu, 01 Feb 1996 17:07

Re: Give operator. a chance
By: Valentin Bonnard on Thu, 01 Feb 1996 17:10

Re: When can definitions of library functions be provided by a program?
By: James Kanze US/ESC 60/3/141 #407... on Thu, 01 Feb 1996 16:35

new T[0] and sizeof(T)
By: Marek MAKOWSKI on Thu, 01 Feb 1996 15:49

Re: Cleaning auto_ptr copy semantics.
By: James Kanze US/ESC 60/3/141 #407... on Thu, 01 Feb 1996 15:53

#ifdef XXXX
By: Marek MAKOWSKI on Thu, 01 Feb 1996 15:50

Re: inconsistance in over.over
By: David Vandevoorde on Thu, 01 Feb 1996 13:17

Re: When can definitions of library functions be provided by a program?
By: Steve Clamage on Thu, 01 Feb 1996 13:18

Re: Time representations
By: Pete Forman on Thu, 01 Feb 1996 02:09

Re: Cleaning auto_ptr copy semantics.
By: Richard Henderson on Thu, 01 Feb 1996 02:01

Re: friend inline vs inline friend
By: James Kanze US/ESC 60/3/141 #407... on Thu, 01 Feb 1996 01:58

inconsistance in over.over
By: Alexander Krotoff on Thu, 01 Feb 1996 01:53

Incompatibility C++ <-> ANSI-C
By: Alexander Krotoff on Thu, 01 Feb 1996 01:51

Re: Observations on templates
By: Jason Merrill on Thu, 01 Feb 1996 00:07

Re: Give operator. a chance
By: Jason Merrill on Thu, 01 Feb 1996 00:07

Re: Guarantees concerning references/pointers into string
By: James Kanze US/ESC 60/3/141 #407... on Wed, 31 Jan 1996 17:39

Re: and, or, not
By: Beman Dawes on Thu, 01 Feb 1996 01:32

When can definitions of library functions be provided by a program?
By: Michael Greenberg on Wed, 31 Jan 1996 20:44

Re: Incompatibility C++ <-> ANSI-C
By: Mike Ball on Wed, 31 Jan 1996 22:10

RE: An STL helper -- and template and type shenanigans
By: Eugene Lazutkin on Wed, 31 Jan 1996 20:04

Re: and, or, not
By: Steve Clamage on Tue, 30 Jan 1996 16:31

Re: Give operator. a chance
By: Steve Clamage on Tue, 30 Jan 1996 16:31

Incompatibility C++ <-> ANSI-C
By: Tilo Koerbs on Tue, 30 Jan 1996 15:45

Re: ambiguous typedef
By: Fergus Henderson on Mon, 29 Jan 1996 16:05

Re: Guarantees concerning references/pointers into string
By: John Max Skaller on Sun, 28 Jan 1996 23:24

Re: Throwing an exception from within a signal handler
By: J. Kanze on Sun, 28 Jan 1996 17:03

Re: basic_string<T>::npos
By: J. Kanze on Sun, 28 Jan 1996 17:03

Re: auto_ptr again
By: john (j.d.) hickin on Fri, 26 Jan 1996 22:56

Re: FW: FW: Inherent C++ problem?
By: Bernd Anhaeupl on Fri, 26 Jan 1996 16:48

Cleaning auto_ptr copy semantics.
By: Greg Colvin on Fri, 26 Jan 1996 15:47

Re: Give operator. a chance
By: Fergus Henderson on Fri, 26 Jan 1996 15:47

Re: Give operator. a chance
By: Joe Buck on Fri, 26 Jan 1996 00:05

Re: base class operator hiding
By: Russell Johnston on Fri, 26 Jan 1996 00:05

Re: Why no allocator-specific delete?
By: eddy Gorsuch on Thu, 25 Jan 1996 20:12

Re: Give operator. a chance
By: Steve Clamage on Thu, 25 Jan 1996 19:14

Smalltalk, C++, O.O. Links WWW Page
By: ooss on Thu, 25 Jan 1996 17:28

friend inline vs inline friend
By: Nobuhiko Katayama on Thu, 25 Jan 1996 16:12

Re: Give operator. a chance
By: Fergus Henderson on Thu, 25 Jan 1996 16:12

Explicit constructor call vs Temporaries
By: eddy Gorsuch on Thu, 25 Jan 1996 16:12

U.S. monitary unit.
By: Max TenEyck Woodbury on Wed, 31 Jan 1996 03:39

Time representations
By: Max TenEyck Woodbury on Wed, 31 Jan 1996 04:24

Re: Incompatibility C++ <-> ANSI-C
By: Steve Clamage on Tue, 30 Jan 1996 17:52

(no subject)
By: john (j.d.) hickin on Tue, 30 Jan 1996 17:51

Re: Observations on templates
By: Jason Merrill on Tue, 30 Jan 1996 04:52

and, or, not
By: Cay S. Horstmann on Tue, 30 Jan 1996 04:47

Re: Give operator. a chance
By: Dick Menninger on Tue, 30 Jan 1996 04:20

Nonpolled response to asynchronous activity [Was "Throwing ...]
By: Tom Payne on Mon, 29 Jan 1996 22:27

Re: Observations on templates
By: David Vandevoorde on Mon, 29 Jan 1996 19:15

Appendix C (Compatibility)
By: Alexander Krotoff on Mon, 29 Jan 1996 19:15

Re: FW: Inherent C++ problem (for comp.std.c++)
By: John Max Skaller on Mon, 29 Jan 1996 18:54

Are all Windows programs ill-formed?
By: Eugene Radchenko on Mon, 29 Jan 1996 18:52

Re: An STL helper -- and template and type shenanigans
By: Fergus Henderson on Mon, 29 Jan 1996 18:50

Sep '95 draft standard: meaning of 14.5
By: Hugo van der Sanden on Mon, 29 Jan 1996 15:53

Re: Why no allocator-specific delete?
By: James Kanze US/ESC 60/3/141 #407... on Mon, 29 Jan 1996 10:41

Observations on templates
By: Eugene Radchenko on Mon, 29 Jan 1996 10:38

ambiguous typedef
By: TABATA Tomohira on Mon, 29 Jan 1996 06:37

Re: Give operator. a chance
By: Fergus Henderson on Sun, 28 Jan 1996 23:58

typeinfo
By: John Max Skaller on Mon, 29 Jan 1996 00:05

Re: Enhanced container functionality
By: Lars Farm on Mon, 29 Jan 1996 00:03

Re: Throwing an exception from within a signal handler
By: Tom Payne on Sat, 27 Jan 1996 00:52

Re: Throwing an exception from within a signal handler
By: Tom Payne on Sat, 27 Jan 1996 00:18

Re: Give operator. a chance
By: austern Matt Austern on Fri, 26 Jan 1996 19:52

Re: Why no allocator-specific delete?
By: John Max Skaller on Fri, 26 Jan 1996 19:23

Re: auto_ptr again
By: John Max Skaller on Fri, 26 Jan 1996 19:17

Re: Enhanced container functionality
By: John Max Skaller on Fri, 26 Jan 1996 19:13

Re: Give operator. a chance
By: jodle on Fri, 26 Jan 1996 17:36

Why is there no 'queue::top()'?
By: Dietmar Kuehl on Fri, 26 Jan 1996 17:33