🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <43qheu$l1o@caip.rutgers.edu>, halasz@caip.rutgers.edu writes:
>In article <DF8FE3.97H@news.cern.ch>, loreti@axcdf1.pd.infn.it (Maurizio Loreti) writes
>: ...  To have a
>: clear indication of where exactly a break(n) jumps, would it not be
>: better to write it "break <label>"?  And what is that construct?  A
>: GOTO WITH A DIFFERENT NAME.
>No more, no less, than "while", "switch", "if" also are.
>The important differens between "goto" and suggested "break <label>" is
>context: a "goto" and its label mai hav almost anie relativ pozition
>within the function, but "break" and its label hav no such freedom.
>
>Plz not misinform such poor souls with the notion that there can be
>nothing better than "goto" in such case; Awozniak@Galaxy.csc.calpoly.edu
>is on the right track.
>
>This discussion is quite old nou; look through postings no more than 
>three weeks old in "comp.std.c".  There hav been excellent suggestions.

Can some kind soul translate to english (or italian) that answer?

Maurizio Loreti                       http://mvxpd5.pd.infn.it/wwwcdf/mlo.html
Un. of Padova, Dept. of Physics - Padova, Italy          loreti@padova.infn.it