CLOCKS_PER_SEC

Article View: comp.std.c

Article #837

#837

From: Norbert Schlenker
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 1989 16:51

10 lines
901 bytes

I recently posted a note similar to this, but our external links were
very flaky and I don't know whether it ever got out.  I do know that
no reply ever came back.

What happened to the macro CLK_TCK in <time.h>?  Really old copies of
the draft standard have it, but Dec 1988 has CLOCKS_PER_SEC instead.
The POSIX documentation is full of stuff that depends on X3J11 defining
this in <time.h>.  What should I do?

Norbert

Technical Details

Message-ID: <20538@princeton.Princeton.EDU>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!wuarchive!udel!princeton!notecnirp!nfs

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!wuarchive!udel!princeton!notecnirp!nfs
From: nfs@notecnirp.Princeton.EDU (Norbert Schlenker)
Newsgroups: comp.std.c
Subject: CLOCKS_PER_SEC
Summary: What happened to CLK_TCK?
Message-ID: <20538@princeton.Princeton.EDU>
Date: 24 Oct 89 16:51:56 GMT
Sender: news@princeton.Princeton.EDU
Reply-To: nfs@notecnirp.UUCP (Norbert Schlenker)
Organization: Dept. of Computer Science, Princeton University
Lines: 10