Article View: comp.std.c
Article #838Re: Omission re static linkage
From: Walter Murray
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 1989 19:44
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 1989 19:44
31 lines
1383 bytes
1383 bytes
> Consider the following program:
> void f1() {
> extern void f3(void); /* [1] */
> }
> void f2() {
> static void f3(void); /* [2] */
> }
> static void f3() { /* [3] */
> }
> According to section 3.1.2.2, declarations [1] and [3] refer to the
> same identifier, and function f3 has internal linkage.
No, as I read it, the f3 declared in [1] has external linkage because
there is no visible declaration with file scope at that point. The
f3 declared in [3] does indeed have internal linkage. Because the
same identifier appears with both external and internal linkage,
behavior is undefined.
> However, the
> standard neglects to state what declaration [2] refers to.
Declaration [2] violates a constraint of 3.5.1: "The declaration
of an identifier for a function that has block scope shall have no
explicit storage-class specifier other than extern."
> Norman Diamond, Sony Corp.
Walter Murray
----------
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<12570029@hpclwjm.HP.COM>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uwm.edu!gem.mps.ohio-state.edu!apple!motcsd!hpda!hpcuhb!hpcllla!hpclisp!hpclwjm!walterReferences:
<10975@riks.csl.sony.co.jp>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uwm.edu!gem.mps.ohio-state.edu!apple!motcsd!hpda!hpcuhb!hpcllla!hpclisp!hpclwjm!walter From: walter@hpclwjm.HP.COM (Walter Murray) Newsgroups: comp.std.c Subject: Re: Omission re static linkage Message-ID: <12570029@hpclwjm.HP.COM> Date: 23 Oct 89 19:44:55 GMT References: <10975@riks.csl.sony.co.jp> Organization: Hewlett-Packard Calif. Language Lab Lines: 31