Re: Why can't you define an external object twice and never use it?

Article View: comp.std.c

Article #898

#898

From: Paul Eggert
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 1989 02:11

11 lines
982 bytes

I asked what was wrong with the external definitions `int X = 0; int X = 0;'
if X is used nowhere else.  Doug Gwyn replied:

	I don't know why you cite constraints on multiple definition;
	the real problem is that you have violated the "only one
	initialization" constraint.

Where is this constraint written down?  It's not in either pANS 3.5.7
("Initialization") or pANS 3.7 ("External definitions"), where I would
have expected it.  I fear it was so obvious that it wasn't written
down anywhere.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <54@looney.twinsun.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!usc!ucla-cs!twinsun!eggert

References: <53@looney.twinsun.com> <11582@smoke.BRL.MIL>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!usc!ucla-cs!twinsun!eggert
From: eggert@twinsun.com (Paul Eggert)
Newsgroups: comp.std.c
Subject: Re: Why can't you define an external object twice and never use it?
Message-ID: <54@looney.twinsun.com>
Date: 14 Nov 89 02:11:05 GMT
References: <53@looney.twinsun.com> <11582@smoke.BRL.MIL>
Sender: news@twinsun.com
Reply-To: eggert@twinsun.com (Paul Eggert)
Organization: Twin Sun, Inc
Lines: 11

Reply to Parent Message