varargs vs. stdargs

Article View: comp.std.c

Article #899

#899

From: Gregory N. Bond
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 1989 23:38

13 lines
1023 bytes

I'm-sure-this-has-been-hashed-to-death-before-but:

Is there some method of specifying varadic functions that is portable
to both old (varargs) and new (stdargs) implementations?  Is there an
ANSI prototype for old varargs functions?  Or do I have two prototyes
and two implementations surrounded by #if __STDC__?  (My varargs is
the SunOs 3.5 one, in case there are many versions...)

Greg.
--
Gregory Bond, Burdett Buckeridge & Young Ltd, Melbourne, Australia
Internet: gnb@melba.bby.oz.au    non-MX: gnb%melba.bby.oz@uunet.uu.net
Uucp: {uunet,pyramid,ubc-cs,ukc,mcvax,prlb2,nttlab...}!munnari!melba.bby.oz!gnb

Technical Details

Message-ID: <GNB.89Nov14103800@baby.bby.oz>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!shadooby!samsung!munnari.oz.au!murtoa.cs.mu.oz.au!ditmela!yarra!melba.bby.oz.au!leo!gnb

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!shadooby!samsung!munnari.oz.au!murtoa.cs.mu.oz.au!ditmela!yarra!melba.bby.oz.au!leo!gnb
From: gnb@bby.oz (Gregory N. Bond)
Newsgroups: comp.std.c
Subject: varargs vs. stdargs
Message-ID: <GNB.89Nov14103800@baby.bby.oz>
Date: 13 Nov 89 23:38:00 GMT
Sender: news@melba.bby.oz.au
Organization: Burdett, Buckeridge and Young Ltd.
Lines: 13