Article View: comp.std.unix
Article #970Re: Standards Update, POSIX.7b: Software Administration
From: peter da silva
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 1993 00:27
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 1993 00:27
26 lines
1628 bytes
1628 bytes
Submitted-by: peter@ferranti.com (peter da silva)
In article <1hqj9sINN9mu@ftp.UU.NET> std-unix@uunet.uu.net writes:
> Forging ahead in areas where they feel they can make
> consensus based progress, POSIX.7 is now split into two documents
> called POSIX.7a (print queue administration) and POSIX.7b (software
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> administration).
Isn't this a rather narrow subject for a POSIX standard... not to mention
being pretty much covered by two completely irreconcilable models (BSD
and System V).
You're going to have to dump BSD spooling, dump System V spooling, or
dump both and create something out of whole cloth. If it's the latter,
why not create a generalised batch queueing and scheduling system that
just happens to include printing?
I assume 7b is where all the interesting stuff is going to be.
--
Peter da Silva `-_-'
Ferranti International Controls Corporation 'U`
Sugar Land, TX 77487-5012 USA
+1 713 274 5180 "Zure otsoa besarkatu al duzu gaur?"
Volume-Number: Volume 30, Number 16
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1iakluINNblv@ftp.UU.NET>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!not-for-mailReferences:
<1hqj9sINN9mu@ftp.UU.NET>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!not-for-mail From: peter@ferranti.com (peter da silva) Newsgroups: comp.std.unix Subject: Re: Standards Update, POSIX.7b: Software Administration Date: 4 Jan 1993 16:27:42 -0800 Organization: Xenix Support, FICC Lines: 26 Sender: sef@ftp.UU.NET Approved: sef@ftp.uucp (Moderator, Sean Eric Fagan) Message-ID: <1iakluINNblv@ftp.UU.NET> References: <1hqj9sINN9mu@ftp.UU.NET> NNTP-Posting-Host: ftp.uu.net X-Submissions: std-unix@uunet.uu.net