Re: Multiple implementations of a specification (was about component libraries)

Article View: comp.sw.components

Article #328

Back to comp.sw.components Previous Next

#328

From: Andrew P. Mullhaupt
Date: Wed, 06 Dec 1989 05:02

11 lines
985 bytes

Has any work been done on specifying lower bounds on performance and
upper bounds on resource demands for implementations? Engineers often
need to distinguish between feasible and infeasible implementations
on the basis of cost. One can even conceive of cases where the
resource in question is program development time, which might skew
towards using 'off the shelf' components as opposed to end-use
specifications which try to conserve run-time resources.

Later,
Andrew Mullhaupt

Technical Details

Message-ID: <579@s5.Morgan.COM>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!mstan!amull

References: <89@<DWIGGINS> <130200023@p.cs.uiuc.edu> <DWIGGINS.89Dec1111655@atsun.a-t.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!mstan!amull
From: amull@Morgan.COM (Andrew P. Mullhaupt)
Newsgroups: comp.sw.components
Subject: Re: Multiple implementations of a specification (was about component libraries)
Summary: Performance specification -
Message-ID: <579@s5.Morgan.COM>
Date: 6 Dec 89 05:02:10 GMT
References: <89@<DWIGGINS> <130200023@p.cs.uiuc.edu> <DWIGGINS.89Dec1111655@atsun.a-t.com>
Organization: Morgan Stanley & Co. NY, NY
Lines: 11

Reply to Parent Message