Article View: comp.sys.acorn.misc
Article #132Re: Modem has indicated....
From: Robert M
Date: Sun, 21 Dec 1997 00:00
Date: Sun, 21 Dec 1997 00:00
96 lines
3126 bytes
3126 bytes
Harry Bradley wrote in message <47fb8f9078hbradley@argonet.co.uk>. .. >I seem to be plagued with disconnections indicated as: > >The Modem has indicated that it has lost the signal. As a result, Voyager >has been disconnected from the Internet. > >Now this is not too annoying under normal circumstances, but since I am >a Cable & Wireless/Mercury subscriber, many of you will doubtless know >that at weekends I can connect for as long as I like for a maximum >charge of 50p. >Consequently each time the connection is lost, charging starts again !! >Over the ten weeks since the offer started, about four fifths of my >connections have failed, at differing durations from 40 mins to over >4 hours. >I have generally contacted C&W soon after, and on earlier occasions they >said they could trace the call within one hour. At the time they could not >prove whether the fault was theirs or elsewhere, so I got a couple of >refunds. I dont always bother to re-connect. Then on several weekends C&W >had computer problems and could not check anything. >I use a Smart Socket plus and they thought this might be the cause, but >by-passing it proved no help. >C&W also suggested that I get BT to up the gain on my line, but since I >was then on an analogue TX4E exchange, it was not possible. >Earlier this month my exchange was changed over to digital, but the >following weekend it happened again. >This time C&W said they were able to check their switches, and they were >not at fault, but that the call was broken at the other end, by my ISP >PIPEX. >I have also tried dialling in on a different number, but the problem >remains. >I have complained through Argonet /who have my account/ but had no >response yet. >Is there a PIPEX complaints number ? >Anyone else had similar problems ? >Can C&W, up to an hour later, tell where a connection failed ? > >I would add that I have not had this problem when connected via BT, but >then I rarely exceed 60 mins when using BT. > >Any help gratefully received. I had this problem with BTI a while ago connecting through BT. The problem turned out to be a modem incompatibility between my Motorola 3400 and their modems. The problem was fixed when BTI provided me with a new init. string. Robert
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<67k6no$dp$1@plutonium.btinternet.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<47fb8f9078hbradley@argonet.co.uk>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 104d22,ccde9f47ca3b3749 X-Google-Attributes: gid104d22,public X-Google-Thread: 114575,ccde9f47ca3b3749 X-Google-Attributes: gid114575,public X-Google-Thread: f73c4,ccde9f47ca3b3749 X-Google-Attributes: gidf73c4,public From: "Robert M" <dont_reply@here.com> Subject: Re: Modem has indicated.... Date: 1997/12/21 Message-ID: <67k6no$dp$1@plutonium.btinternet.com> X-Deja-AN: 309174453 References: <47fb8f9078hbradley@argonet.co.uk> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.71.1712.3 X-Complaints-To: usenet@btinternet.com X-Trace: plutonium.btinternet.com 882744888 441 (None) 194.75.226.24 Organization: BT Internet X-Client-Address: 195.99.55.58 Newsgroups: comp.sys.acorn.misc,argonet.acorn.misc,uk.telecom