Article View: comp.sys.acorn.tech
Article #424ARMXX & MHz
From: Aeon Flux
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1992 15:01
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1992 15:01
40 lines
1459 bytes
1459 bytes
Salutations, Not being a real techy I was pondering this question last night and wondering why I couldn't come up with an answer. An Arm2 runs at 8Mhz and has approx "mippage" of 4 An Arm3 runs at 26Mhz and has approx "mippage" of 13 Rumour has it that the next ArmX chip runs at 50Mhz and has approx mippage of 28 Now then, what I don't understand is the Arm3 has a 4k cache which helps to speed things up, right? The Arm3 (most common ones) are approx 3 times faster than an Arm2 - is this because they are clocked 3 times faster? If so, where does the cache help? Taking this argument to the next ArmX at 50Mhz - it runs approx twice as fast as the Arm3 (again clock speed is "doubled") so shouldn't this be faster still due to improvements on the design off the chip? Someone, please explain this to me Confused Jayce -- "I may be a shallow guy, but a shallow guy with a great ass!" - Cat, Red Dwarf Jason "Archangel" Banham Internet: cs89jmb@brunel.ac.uk aangel@sequent.co.uk ***** Acorn rep on StudentSoft/Archimedes owner/Computer Scientist *****
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<BxntqI.1Io@brunel.ac.uk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!uknet!brunel!cs89jmbShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!uknet!brunel!cs89jmb From: cs89jmb@brunel.ac.uk (Aeon Flux) Newsgroups: comp.sys.acorn.tech Subject: ARMXX & MHz Message-ID: <BxntqI.1Io@brunel.ac.uk> Date: 13 Nov 92 15:01:26 GMT Organization: Brunel University, Uxbridge, UK Lines: 40 X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL6]