Article View: comp.sys.amiga.cd32
Article #1130Re: Which is better ? CD32 + SX32 or CD32 + A1200 ?
From: Digital Arts Software
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 1996 11:15
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 1996 11:15
66 lines
3392 bytes
3392 bytes
In article: <4kj6rv$k71@mserv1.dl.ac.uk> Robin Hood <bx@dl.ac.uk> writes:
>
> Hi, Anyone using CD32+ A1200 setup ?
>
> I understand A1200 can use CD32 as a slave drive to
> fetch files from CD. If a program on the CD
> is executed from A1200, is it run on CD32, or A1200, or on both ?
> Can propgram address all the ram on both CD32 and A1200 ?
>
>
> SX32 is indeed a very neat add-on for CD32,
> but for the cost of a Bare SX32, you can get both CD32 and a A1200
> (USED) that has buit-in FDD and keyboard, and more expansion potential.
> than SX32. the only drawback of the later set-up is that the 2Mb CD32 chip ram
> may not be shared by the whole system, but A1200 has 2 Mb instead.
>
> My only complaint for SX32 is it is too expensive.
> hope the price will be more reasonable soon. as far as
> profit of a product is concerned, do not forget
>
> $100 x 1000 >> $200 x 100
>
You can currently purchase a CD32 for around 130-200 from
most mail order companies in the UK.
Add this to the Total price of an SX1 or SX32
SX32 - 240 Inc A1000 Compact Keyboard
SX1 - 220 Inc PC Style Keyboard
Ext Floppy from 20-80 DD & HD
A NEW A1200 costs 399.99 from Amiga Technologies.
and you need a CDROM DRIVE on top of this to access
CDs...
When connecting a CD32 to any other Amiga, file transfer
is really slow. an SX1 or SX32 setup give instant CD access!
I have used the CD32 NetworkCDs 1&2 and when they crash its
a real pain up the backside, having to reboot both machines
and start again....
Its upto you, but in our office we have 3 SX1+CD32s with
4-8Mb and 80-200Mb Harddisks and they work great. We even
have on of the CD32+SX1 connected to the Internet via
a 14.4 modem and Ibrowse and THOR.. it works great, better
than some scummy PeeCEE + Netscape setup.
Darren Evans
Amiga Project Manager
_ ____ ___ ______ _______ _
d# ####b g#00 `N##0" _agN#0P0N# d#
d## jN## j##F J## _dN0" " d##
.#]## _P ##L jN##F ### g#0" .#]##
dE_j## # 0## jF ##F j##F j##' ______ dE_j##
.0"""N## d" ##L0 ##F 0## 0## "9##F" .0"""5##
.dF' ]## jF ##0 ##F ##F `##k d## .dF' j##
.g#_ _j##___g#__ ]N _j##L_ _d##L_ `#Nh___g#N' .g#_ _j##__
""""" """"""""""" " """""" """""" """"""" """"" """"""
+----------------------- Back for the future -----------------------+
Digital Arts Public Domain Software
< http://www.netlink.co.uk/users/digiarts >
< E-Mail: Darren@zenecaen.demon.co.uk >
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<75637597wnr@zenecaen.demon.co.uk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!mail2news.demon.co.uk!zenecaen.demon.co.ukReferences:
<4kj6rv$k71@mserv1.dl.ac.uk>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!mail2news.demon.co.uk!zenecaen.demon.co.uk From: Digital Arts Software <DigitalA@zenecaen.demon.co.uk> Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.cd32 Subject: Re: Which is better ? CD32 + SX32 or CD32 + A1200 ? Date: Fri, 12 Apr 1996 11:15:13 GMT Organization: None Message-ID: <75637597wnr@zenecaen.demon.co.uk> References: <4kj6rv$k71@mserv1.dl.ac.uk> Reply-To: DigitalA@zenecaen.demon.co.uk X-NNTP-Posting-Host: zenecaen.demon.co.uk X-Broken-Date: Friday, Apr 12, 1996 11.15.13 X-Newsreader: Newswin Alpha 0.7 X-Mail2News-Path: disperse.demon.co.uk!post.demon.co.uk!zenecaen.demon.co.uk