🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.sys.amiga.cd32
Article #1130

Re: Which is better ? CD32 + SX32 or CD32 + A1200 ?

#1130
From: Digital Arts Software
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 1996 11:15
66 lines
3392 bytes
In article: <4kj6rv$k71@mserv1.dl.ac.uk>  Robin Hood <bx@dl.ac.uk> writes:
> 
> Hi,  Anyone using CD32+ A1200 setup ?
> 
> I understand A1200 can use CD32 as a slave drive to
> fetch files from CD. If a program on the CD 
> is  executed from A1200, is it run on CD32, or A1200, or on both ?
> Can propgram address all the ram on both CD32 and A1200 ?
> 
> 
> SX32 is indeed a very neat add-on for CD32, 
> but for the cost of a Bare SX32, you can get both  CD32 and  a A1200 
> (USED) that has buit-in FDD and keyboard, and more expansion potential.
> than SX32. the only drawback of the later set-up is that the 2Mb CD32 chip ram
> may not be shared by the whole system, but A1200 has 2 Mb instead.
> 
> My only complaint for SX32 is it is too expensive.
> hope the price will be more reasonable soon. as far as
> profit of a product is concerned, do not forget
> 
> $100 x 1000 >> $200 x 100 
>  

You can currently purchase a CD32 for around 130-200 from
most mail order companies in the UK.

Add this to the Total price of an SX1 or SX32

SX32 - 240 Inc A1000 Compact Keyboard
SX1  - 220 Inc PC Style Keyboard

Ext Floppy from 20-80 DD & HD

A NEW A1200 costs 399.99 from Amiga Technologies.
and you need a CDROM DRIVE on top of this to access
CDs... 

When connecting a CD32 to any other Amiga, file transfer
is really slow. an SX1 or SX32 setup give instant CD access!

I have used the CD32 NetworkCDs 1&2 and when they crash its
a real pain up the backside, having to reboot both machines
and start again....

Its upto you, but in our office we have 3 SX1+CD32s with
4-8Mb and 80-200Mb Harddisks and they work great. We even
have on of the CD32+SX1 connected to the Internet via
a 14.4 modem and Ibrowse and THOR.. it works great, better
than some scummy PeeCEE + Netscape setup.

Darren Evans
Amiga Project Manager

               _      ____       ___   ______       _______          _
              d#      ####b     g#00   `N##0"    _agN#0P0N#         d#
             d##       jN##    j##F     J##    _dN0"      "        d##
           .#]##      _P ##L  jN##F     ###   g#0"               .#]##
          dE_j##      #  0## jF ##F    j##F  j##'    ______     dE_j##
        .0"""N##     d"   ##L0  ##F    0##   0##     "9##F"   .0"""5##
      .dF'   ]##    jF    ##0   ##F    ##F   `##k     d##   .dF'   j##
    .g#_    _j##___g#__   ]N  _j##L_ _d##L_   `#Nh___g#N' .g#_    _j##__
   """""    """""""""""    "  """""" """"""      """"""" """""    """"""
   +----------------------- Back for the future -----------------------+
                    Digital Arts Public Domain Software
                < http://www.netlink.co.uk/users/digiarts >
                <   E-Mail: Darren@zenecaen.demon.co.uk   >              
Technical Details
Message-ID: <75637597wnr@zenecaen.demon.co.uk>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!mail2news.demon.co.uk!zenecaen.demon.co.uk
References: <4kj6rv$k71@mserv1.dl.ac.uk>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!mail2news.demon.co.uk!zenecaen.demon.co.uk
From: Digital Arts Software <DigitalA@zenecaen.demon.co.uk>
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.cd32
Subject: Re: Which is better ? CD32 + SX32 or CD32 + A1200 ?
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 1996 11:15:13 GMT
Organization: None
Message-ID: <75637597wnr@zenecaen.demon.co.uk>
References: <4kj6rv$k71@mserv1.dl.ac.uk>
Reply-To: DigitalA@zenecaen.demon.co.uk
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: zenecaen.demon.co.uk
X-Broken-Date: Friday, Apr 12, 1996 11.15.13
X-Newsreader: Newswin Alpha 0.7
X-Mail2News-Path: disperse.demon.co.uk!post.demon.co.uk!zenecaen.demon.co.uk