🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.sys.amiga.cd32
Article #1131

Re: Which is better ? CD32 + SX32 or CD32 + A1200 ?

#1131
From: Casper
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 1996 17:39
52 lines
2390 bytes
On 11 Apr 1996 15:01:19 GMT, Robin Hood (bx@dl.ac.uk) wrote:
: Hi,  Anyone using CD32+ A1200 setup ?

No but I have used one, and your question is easy enough
even if I hadn't.

: I understand A1200 can use CD32 as a slave drive to
: fetch files from CD. If a program on the CD

Yes, but it unuseably slow except for grabbing files of an
Aminet CD or similar.

: is  executed from A1200, is it run on CD32, or A1200, or on both ?

It is run on the A1200, as that is the computer you are accessing it
from.

: Can propgram address all the ram on both CD32 and A1200 ?

I don't know what propgram is, but it would be pointless addressing
the RAM on the CD32 if you're using the A1200 (and vice-versa)
because of the slow speed.

: SX32 is indeed a very neat add-on for CD32,

Yup, sure is.

: but for the cost of a Bare SX32, you can get both  CD32 and  a A1200
: (USED) that has buit-in FDD and keyboard, and more expansion potential.
: than SX32. the only drawback of the later set-up is that the 2Mb CD32 chip ram
: may not be shared by the whole system, but A1200 has 2 Mb instead.

The main dis-advantage is not that, but that a Sernet link is little
faster than a 28.8k modem.

: My only complaint for SX32 is it is too expensive.

They cost quite a bit to produce. Most of the controller chips for
FD and HD are in there. Don't think most of it's going to profit.

: hope the price will be more reasonable soon. as far as
: profit of a product is concerned, do not forget
: $100 x 1000 >> $200 x 100 

But when the SX32s cost more than 100 dollars to produce, you are
making a loss.

Stu. :)
-- 
Stuart Tomlinson  casper@tomonet.demon.co.uk  http://spasm.clues.com/stuart/
            Stu is who I am, Casper is what I stand for.
                   'You're, you're Kat's mum?'
Technical Details
Message-ID: <9604121739.AA002lm@tomonet.demon.co.uk>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!mail2news.demon.co.uk!tomonet.demon.co.uk
References: <4kj6rv$k71@mserv1.dl.ac.uk>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!mail2news.demon.co.uk!tomonet.demon.co.uk
From: Casper <casper@tomonet.demon.co.uk>
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.cd32
Subject: Re: Which is better ? CD32 + SX32 or CD32 + A1200 ?
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 96 17:39:19 GMT
Organization: Whipstaff Manor
Message-ID: <9604121739.AA002lm@tomonet.demon.co.uk>
References: <4kj6rv$k71@mserv1.dl.ac.uk>
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: tomonet.demon.co.uk
X-Newsreader: TIN [AMIGA 1.3 950726BETA PL0]
X-News2Mail: <tez@pierrot.demon.co.uk>
X-Mail2News-Path: disperse.demon.co.uk!post.demon.co.uk!tomonet.demon.co.uk