🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <4ibnli$fjc@cdc2.cdc.net> giannini@vianet.on.ca (Vince Giannini) writes:
>Th.Huber (judas@tomtec.abg.sub.org) wrote:
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

>: What are you talking about ?
   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
>We are talking about Cybergraphics, a replacement interface/WB emulation 
>for most of the popular graphics boards, that offers a main standard in 
>retargetable graphics.

Sorry, but this question wasn`t raised by me ..... I only stated that
CGFX is slower compared to retinaemu, so some people still use retinaemu
instead.


>My main reason for wanting CyberGFX is for greater compatibility with 
>software because of standardized rtg.  There is alot more software 
>available via CyberGFX than with the RetinaEmu.

CGFX is available for some boards, but not for all. (e.g. not for RetinaZ2,
RainbowIII). Unfortunately there aren`t any dox about writing your own driver
available, so you`re not able to adapt your card to the "standard".

>And AFAIK, 
>CyberGFX is indeed faster than most of the emul software already included 
>with graphics boards.

Faster is not true, compared to RetinaEMU using a Z3, or compared to EGS7.2.
(EGS is about 2.5 times faster on a EGS-Spectrum)