Re: What are the diffs between LW4.0/Imagine

Article View: comp.sys.amiga.graphics

Article #9049

Back to comp.sys.amiga.graphics Previous Next

#9049

From: Victor Vargas G.
Date: Thu, 04 Apr 1996 07:41

16 lines
1164 bytes

In article <19960402.70A3188.47A3@obscurity.pd.mcs.net>,
tpitts@obscurity.pd.mcs.net (Terrence Pitts) wrote:

> I guess in the long run for price to performance and high-quality animations,
> Lightwave 3D is a very powerful program, so if you have to choose which one,
> IMHO it's Lightwave.

I agree... when I started using Imagine 3.0, its 'new mode' editor
(similar to LWave's stage) really helped me, but then I got LWave and the
ability to tweak motion splines and scaling of keys/scenes made me stop
using Imagine for daily use... the things I  miss from it are some of the
modeler's edit modes, the hidden-line wireframe previews, and the many
useful textures (that DeathStar and granite!!)

-- 
Victor Vargas G.  Amiga 3D animation & video graphics/Mac DTP

Technical Details

Message-ID: <fulldog-0404960138470001@167.114.251.19>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!news.sfasu.edu!NewsWatcher!user

References: <19960402.70A3188.47A3@obscurity.pd.mcs.net>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.graphics
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!news.sfasu.edu!NewsWatcher!user
From: fulldog@tag01.acnet.net (Victor Vargas G.)
Subject: Re: What are the diffs between LW4.0/Imagine
Message-ID: <fulldog-0404960138470001@167.114.251.19>
Date: Thu, 04 Apr 1996 07:41:22 GMT
Distribution: world
References: <19960402.70A3188.47A3@obscurity.pd.mcs.net>
Organization: NoneYet :^\

Reply to Parent Message