🚀 go-pugleaf

Hi Dan,

dritter@direct.ca (dan ritter) wrote:

:Well I think the problem here is the speed of the machine.  Not the OS.  The
:machine you're running that on is really no faster than an original Amiga 
:1000 made back in 1985.  Sure, they improved the graphics by adding more chip
:ram and an ECS graphics chipset.  But the speed of the computer is the same.
:That's why I would recommend an accelerator.  The OS is not the problem here.
:
:L8ter 8-]

I think that both have there problems and here is why I think that:

I have a A-500 1MEG Chip RAM, GVP A-530 (63030/40, 4MEGS 32-bit Fast RAM). 
When I upgraded to OS 3.1 not to long ago from 2.1, I noticed that the OS was 
now using alot more CPU time then the older OS.

So I agree that he could use a accelerator, but diffinetly needs one it he 
goes to a newer OS. This being the case, if we do see OS 4.x, then without 
question he would need one at this rate.

But if he desides that he doesn't want a accelerator, then he might be better 
off not getting a OS upgrade.

Just some thoughts on the matter,

Michael (shotgun@slip.net)