🚀 go-pugleaf

burchell@fox.nstn.ca (Paul Burchell) wrote:

>>Roland Bengtsson (roland.bengtsson@mbox3.swipnet.se) said:
>>>>>interesting me.  The thing is, I don't have any idea what
>>>>>hardware I should get to get started.  A1200?  2000?  3000?  4000?

>>> >:As for an Amiga.  ONLY go for an A1200 or A4000.  Others are out dated,
>>> >:and  don`t have the "AGA" (or "AA" if you like) chipset.  You *could*
>>> >:wait for the

>>>An A3000 is also a good option. It's fast 25 Mhz 68030, can display 15 Khz
>>>on a cheap VGA-monitor, has builtin SCSI. It's a "real" box with separate
>>>keyboard. If you add a gfxcard you had much better performance than AGA,
>>>but of course you can't play AGA-games.

>>Yes, a 3000 is a far better prospect than a 4000.


>>--
>I was planning on buying a 4000,changed my mind,gonna install a 060/50MHZ C-
>Storm & a C64 GFX Card in my 3000,alot Cheaper then buying a New 4000T,more
>Speed too
>I'm planning on running a Multinode BBS so it'll help,i now run a 1 line BBS

>Paul..

The only problem with the A3000 is the availability of Static Column
Zip RAM expansions.  They are a bit more rare and expensive than the
standard SIMM module, but an A3000 with graphics card and '040
accelerator would kick serious butt...

This is from an A1200 owner no less..

D. G.