Article View: comp.sys.amiga.tech
Article #1077Re: Dealing with multiple scripting languages (was: Elinating the 'rx' from AREXX)
From: Todd M. Lewis
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 1989 20:24
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 1989 20:24
14 lines
1161 bytes
1161 bytes
In article <31742@lll-winken.LLNL.GOV>, jac@muslix.llnl.gov (James Crotinger) writes:
> and both have said "no". Similarly, I've yet to C a book on the ANSI
> standard which says it supports // comments. I hope that ANSI
> did decide to add these at the last minute. I certainly can't see any
> harm in doing so...
a = b //* Go ahead, break my code! */ c;
_____
| Todd M. Lewis Disclaimer: If you want my employer's
||\/| utoddl@ecsvax.uncecs.edu ideas, you'll have to
|| || utoddl@ecsvax.bitnet _buy_ them.
| ||
|___ (Never write a program bigger than your screen.)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<7611@ecsvax.uncecs.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!watmath!iuvax!rutgers!mcnc!ecsvax!utoddlReferences:
<721@lpami.wimsey.bc.ca> <Aug.28.20.36.04.1989.10186@pilot.njin.net> <31742@lll-winken.LLNL.GOV>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!watmath!iuvax!rutgers!mcnc!ecsvax!utoddl From: utoddl@ecsvax.uncecs.edu (Todd M. Lewis) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.tech Subject: Re: Dealing with multiple scripting languages (was: Elinating the 'rx' from AREXX) Summary: // in ANSI C Message-ID: <7611@ecsvax.uncecs.edu> Date: 30 Aug 89 20:24:37 GMT References: <721@lpami.wimsey.bc.ca> <Aug.28.20.36.04.1989.10186@pilot.njin.net> <31742@lll-winken.LLNL.GOV> Organization: UNC Educational Computing Service Lines: 14