Article View: comp.sys.amiga.tech
Article #2354Re: Windows without Front/Back gadgets
From: Stuart H. Ferguson
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 1989 09:26
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 1989 09:26
21 lines
1528 bytes
1528 bytes
+-- srp@modcomp.UUCP (Steve Pietrowicz) writes:
[ example of program using overlapping immobile windows to control user
input state machine ]
| Perhaps the real question here is this: Is using windows to cover up portions
| of a screen a "correct" thing to do, or should this be avoided? Is there
| a better overall way to handle the problem?
My personal opinion is that controling the user's control sequence in
this way is a bad practice. Not just because click-to-front utilities
will screw it up, but also on general principles. "Modeless" is a big
buzzword in User Interface circles these days, and for good reason. A
"Mode-full" interface is one like the one described, where the user has
to follow some sequence of steps to get through the control process.
A modeless interface can accomplish the same input tasks, but allowing
the user to do it in his own order. Typically, the same design process
that leads to a modeless interface leads to a more flexible one as well.
Just my two cents.
--
Stuart Ferguson (shf@well.UUCP)
Action by HAVOC (ferguson@metaphor.com)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<14741@well.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!snorkelwacker!apple!well!shfReferences:
<186@modcomp.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!snorkelwacker!apple!well!shf From: shf@well.UUCP (Stuart H. Ferguson) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.tech Subject: Re: Windows without Front/Back gadgets Message-ID: <14741@well.UUCP> Date: 27 Nov 89 09:26:02 GMT References: <186@modcomp.UUCP> Reply-To: shf@well.UUCP (Stuart H. Ferguson) Organization: The Blue Planet Lines: 21