Article View: comp.sys.atari.st
Article #23369ADVOCACY: Re: Convince me to stick with Atari. Why Bother?
From: David Baggett
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1993 15:01
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1993 15:01
64 lines
3621 bytes
3621 bytes
In article <q7a0wB2w165w@status.gen.nz> jonc@status.gen.nz (Jon Clarke) writes: >dmb@case.ai.mit.edu (David Baggett) writes: > >> In article <8FV5wB8w165w@status.gen.nz> jonc@status.gen.nz (Jon Clarke) write >> You say you'll do anything, but you won't even BOTHER giving any >> arguments. Hmmm. >> >> > WHY BOTHER to convince you! >> >> Tell me why I should bother writing more software for you then. >> > Well not wanting to get into a flame war with you Dave or anyone in > paticular, but do you not think this in itself is a defeatist attitude? How is it defeatist? Writing good software takes an enormous amount of time, and in the Atari market it's done with no thanks at all. The attitude of "why bother" is the Atari spirit now, it seems. "Why bother trying to get new users on board?" "Why bother trying to keep developers happy?" "Why bother sending in my shareware payment? Let Dave Baggett rot in hell!" > I personally do not mind if you will or will not write software for me > as a user, as I have all the software I need and it consists of only > a few packages these days. I have ten things to say: "Me me me me me me me me me me." While many of you who still vehemently claim the Atari is a "fun" computer to own, and that companies should develop new things for th ST/TT/Falcon series, you exhibit this kind of "ME" attitude frighteningly often. Face it, folks, the market can't surivive without your support. Atari Corp. has produced the lousy climate, but attitudes like this only make it worse! Again, what impetus is their for me to write more free software, much less commerical software? It used to be that I did it for fun and that I thought I might be able to pay some of my rent with shareware payments every once in a while. It's no longer fun (the machines are SO slow now in comparision to other things I've worked on), and no one cares anymore. Talk about defeatist attitudes -- it's clear from your tone that you DON'T care what happens to Atari developers and Atari users provided YOU'RE happy. It once again blows the theory that the Atari community is wonderfully supportive. > The point I was raising was why do we in this news group always go > throught this "Convience me to stay with Atari" every few months. Because Atari's line of computers sucks by current standards, so people rightly feel that putting more money into them might not be such a great idea. > If you care to read the posts I refered to you would see that his > mind is made up already. I've been reading Chris's messages closely. All the asked was why he shouldn't jump ship? There was a time when you guys could have answered that without name calling and leaping into defensive mode. But then, there are fewer factual reasons to stick with Atari than there were before. Dave Baggett -- dmb@ai.mit.edu MIT Artificial Intelligence Laboratory ADVENTIONS: interactive fiction (text adventures) for the 90's! dmb@ai.mit.edu *** Compu$erve: 76440,2671 *** GEnie: ADVENTIONS
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1iumgmINNsp1@life.ai.mit.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!haven.umd.edu!darwin.sura.net!spool.mu.edu!olivea!mintaka.lcs.mit.edu!ai-lab!case!dmbReferences:
<1ioifmINNivf@life.ai.mit.edu> <q7a0wB2w165w@status.gen.nz>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!haven.umd.edu!darwin.sura.net!spool.mu.edu!olivea!mintaka.lcs.mit.edu!ai-lab!case!dmb From: dmb@case.ai.mit.edu (David Baggett) Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st Subject: ADVOCACY: Re: Convince me to stick with Atari. Why Bother? Message-ID: <1iumgmINNsp1@life.ai.mit.edu> Date: 12 Jan 93 15:01:42 GMT References: <1ioifmINNivf@life.ai.mit.edu> <q7a0wB2w165w@status.gen.nz> Organization: MIT Artificial Intelligence Laboratory Lines: 64 NNTP-Posting-Host: case.ai.mit.edu