Article View: comp.sys.atari.st
Article #28305Re: Atari Transputers ? (Really: stack machines)
From: Dave Pare
Date: Wed, 07 Oct 1987 18:48
Date: Wed, 07 Oct 1987 18:48
18 lines
1541 bytes
1541 bytes
> Second, One of the hallmarks of a true-blue RISC chip, however, is > *LOTS* of registers. The Am29000, for instance, has 192. Only large > structs and arrays need to go off-chip. Is this per-context, or are they shared between all the running processes? After all, the transputer is not a single-process machine! > Thus, the assumption that *everything* is in a register is perfectly > valid, even in situations where other architectures would go off-chip. As I understand it, RISC machines have difficulties once the number of runnable processes gets above the number of "hardware" contexts available to it. I think that if you have a task that fires off 30 processes, the transputer will blow the doors off anything else, because its switching overhead is 10% of most other machines. What is the switch time of the Am29000? Dave Pare
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4044@sdcsvax.UCSD.EDU>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!cmcl2!beta!hc!ames!sdcsvax!amos!mr-frogReferences:
<8709181728.AA13664@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!cmcl2!beta!hc!ames!sdcsvax!amos!mr-frog From: mr-frog@amos.ling.ucsd.edu (Dave Pare) Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st,comp.sys.misc,comp.sys.amiga Subject: Re: Atari Transputers ? (Really: stack machines) Message-ID: <4044@sdcsvax.UCSD.EDU> Date: Wed, 7-Oct-87 14:48:55 EDT Article-I.D.: sdcsvax.4044 Posted: Wed Oct 7 14:48:55 1987 Date-Received: Sat, 10-Oct-87 10:16:51 EDT References: <8709181728.AA13664@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU> Sender: nobody@sdcsvax.UCSD.EDU Reply-To: mr-frog@amos.UUCP (Dave Pare) Organization: Univ. of Calif., San Diego Lines: 18 Keywords: context switch