🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.sys.atari.st
Article #40214

Re: LHARC sources on Sys V

#40214
From: Jwahar R. Bammi
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 1990 06:58
18 lines
1565 bytes
to anyone who may be interested: the LHARC sources recently posted
compiles and runs just fine under TOS when compiled with tos-Gcc. Some
minor adjustments were needed (for 16/32 bit ints), ftruncate() was
pretty easy to simulate. the resulting code is a little smaller than
the Lharc that was posted to comp.binaries.atari.st, and it runs much
quicker too (though its no speed demon, due to the way lzhuf.c is
coded). Unlike the Lharc for St that was posted, and the recently
posted unlzh12, this one handles path names, creating folders etc
correctly. i personally still prefer zoo.

bill shroka (our local archives expert) is currently looking into
speeding up things. he also did an excellent port of zoo to Gcc. his
port is sigificantly faster than the turbo-c compiled one that was
posted to the net, and has all the extra St features also implemented.
--
bang:   {any internet host}!dsrgsun.ces.CWRU.edu!bammi	jwahar r. bammi
domain: bammi@dsrgsun.ces.CWRU.edu
GEnie:	J.Bammi
Technical Details
Message-ID: <BAMMI.90Jan11015405@dsrgsun.ces.CWRU.Edu>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu!bammi
References: <1990Jan8.171126.25297@cs.dal.ca> <570051@otter.hpl.hp.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu!bammi
From: bammi@dsrgsun.ces.CWRU.Edu (Jwahar R. Bammi)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st
Subject: Re: LHARC sources on Sys V
Message-ID: <BAMMI.90Jan11015405@dsrgsun.ces.CWRU.Edu>
Date: 11 Jan 90 06:58:03 GMT
References: <1990Jan8.171126.25297@cs.dal.ca> <570051@otter.hpl.hp.com>
Sender: news@usenet.ins.cwru.edu
Organization: Case Western Reserve University
Lines: 18
In-reply-to: gjh@otter.hpl.hp.com's message of 10 Jan 90 12:18:35 GMT