Re: Turbochannel Adapter for 4000-60?

Article View: comp.sys.dec

Article #1420

#1420

From: CP/M lives!
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 1992 21:19

11 lines
993 bytes

In article <1992Aug20.213536.8692@midway.uchicago.edu>, newark@befvax.uchicago.edu (Tom Newark) writes:
> What I want to know is why you chose to support only one turbo channel 
> slot on the model 60/90?  This is characteristic of dec's lack of foresight.
> (The only thing worse was giving the 3100's no bus at all and a poorly 
> implemented scsi adapter, the worst I've ever seen.)

No room for the connectors, probably. The graphics connector sits right
where the second TURBOchannel connector would have to be.

Roger Ivie
ivie@cc.usu.edu

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1992Aug21.151910.58316@cc.usu.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!caen!hellgate.utah.edu!cc.usu.edu!ivie

References:

<1992Aug14.151407.1@wharfin.mit.edu>,<1992Aug20.115911.24684@engage.pko.dec.com> <1992Aug20.213536.8692@midway.uchicago.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!caen!hellgate.utah.edu!cc.usu.edu!ivie
From: ivie@cc.usu.edu (CP/M lives!)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.dec
Subject: Re: Turbochannel Adapter for 4000-60?
Message-ID: <1992Aug21.151910.58316@cc.usu.edu>
Date: 21 Aug 92 15:19:10 MDT
References: <1992Aug14.151407.1@wharfin.mit.edu>,<1992Aug20.115911.24684@engage.pko.dec.com> <1992Aug20.213536.8692@midway.uchicago.edu>
Organization: Utah State University
Lines: 11

Reply to Parent Message