🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.sys.dec
Article #3037

Any experiences with a WangDAT tape backup?

#3037
From: J. Mark Noworolski
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 1991 00:32
17 lines
1012 bytes
The subject line says it all.

We're thinking about purchasing the WandDAT 2600 tape drive, but a little
concerned that it won't work on our 3100's (under ultrix 4.1).

Has anybody got any experiences to share?

mark
ps: From what I can gather the 2.6Gig stored is a little bogus, since the
storing algorithm uses compression. What if I try to store an already
compressed file? Then it seems that I will only get 1.3Gig on it (or am
I misunderstanding the device?).

--
"There's a really fine line between clever and stupid"
				Nigel- Lead Guitar (Spinal Tap)
jmn@united.berkeley.edu, or jmn@power.berkeley.edu
Technical Details
Message-ID: <jmn.665281937@power.Berkeley.EDU>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!hellgate.utah.edu!dog.ee.lbl.gov!pasteur!power.Berkeley.EDU!jmn

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!hellgate.utah.edu!dog.ee.lbl.gov!pasteur!power.Berkeley.EDU!jmn
From: jmn@power.berkeley.edu (J. Mark Noworolski)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.dec
Subject: Any experiences with a WangDAT tape backup?
Message-ID: <jmn.665281937@power.Berkeley.EDU>
Date: 31 Jan 91 00:32:17 GMT
Sender: news@pasteur.Berkeley.EDU
Lines: 17