Article View: comp.sys.hp.hpux
Article #55Re: Subnetting Class C IP networks
From: Marco S Hyman
Date: Sun, 06 Mar 1994 22:17
Date: Sun, 06 Mar 1994 22:17
14 lines
1436 bytes
1436 bytes
In article <CM8Kny.8Ho@eecs.nwu.edu>, H. Peter Anvin N9ITP <hpa@nwu.edu> wrote: > > PS: Some implementations do permit one-bit subnet ids, but this is non- > > conformant. > > No, they are not. Any application that does *not* permit a one-bit > subnet id is nonconformant. RFC 1009 states "No subnet should be assigned the value 0 or -1 (all one bits)". See second paragraph of page 6. Has this been superseded by a later RFC? // marc -- // marc@dumbcat.sf.ca.us or marc@ascend.com
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<2ldkpk$sq5@dumbcat.sf.ca.us>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmd.de!dearn!blekul11!news.cs.kuleuven.ac.be!ub4b!EU.net!howland.reston.ans.net! news.intercon.com!panix!ddsw1!uunet!ascend.com!dumbcat.sf.ca.us!not-for-mailReferences:
<1994Mar4.142909.12080@cherokee.nsuok.edu> <CM5JM7.D19@cup.hp.com> <CM8Kny.8Ho@eecs.nwu.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fe659,5d0c824272d4a044 X-Google-Attributes: gidfe659,public X-Google-Thread: fcda7,5d0c824272d4a044 X-Google-Attributes: gidfcda7,public X-Google-Thread: 10f035,5d0c824272d4a044 X-Google-Attributes: gid10f035,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-03-06 14:17:24 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmd.de!dearn!blekul11!news.cs.kuleuven.ac.be!ub4b!EU.net!howland.reston.ans.net! news.intercon.com!panix!ddsw1!uunet!ascend.com!dumbcat.sf.ca.us!not-for-mail From: marc@dumbcat.sf.ca.us (Marco S Hyman) Newsgroups: comp.sys.hp.hpux,comp.sys.novell,bit.listserv.novell Subject: Re: Subnetting Class C IP networks Date: 6 Mar 1994 14:17:24 -0800 Organization: Codewrights/Ascend Communications Lines: 14 Message-ID: <2ldkpk$sq5@dumbcat.sf.ca.us> References: <1994Mar4.142909.12080@cherokee.nsuok.edu> <CM5JM7.D19@cup.hp.com> <CM8Kny.8Ho@eecs.nwu.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: dumbcat.sf.ca.us