Article View: comp.sys.hp.hpux
Article #56Re: Subnetting Class C IP networks
From: Steinar Haug
Date: Sun, 06 Mar 1994 20:59
Date: Sun, 06 Mar 1994 20:59
41 lines
2720 bytes
2720 bytes
> >Can you subnet a Class C address, say by using a mask like 255.255.255.128? > >We have two Novell networks that we are with an Ethernet bridge between them. > >Right now, it looks like we will need three Class C address for this: > >one for each ring, and one for the Ethernet bridge. Since the rings are only > >going to have like 20 or 30 clients on each, it seems extremely wasteful to > >use 3*255 potential addresses to serve 60 clients. > Absolutely. We're masking at the .192 level (0xC0) and for our backbone > at the .240 (0xF0) level. > > However -- we've found out -- the very hard way -- over the last two days > that CISCO routers don't like varying subnet masking. What we had was: > > > > ----------CISCO-----NOVELL-----ws > IPX=13487 IXP=13496 IPX=13411 > IP=x.x.240.2 IP=x.x.246.2 > 255.255.255.0 255.255.255.240 255.255.255.192 > > The WS on the left can see the CISCO. The WS on the right can see the > CISCO. From inside Mr. CISCO you can see both. The WS on the left > can login to the netware server. The WS on the left can't ping the WS > on the right (nor, more important, can the WS on the right talk to the > MVS host on the left)... > > Ouch... > > So, be careful out there, test everything! > > Seriously, though, it does work. It's a software limitation of the > CISCO, which will be fixed RSN (6-8 months)... Baloney. Certainly a class C net can be subnetted. You can have variable length subnet masks - as long as you use a sensible routing protocol like OSPF. RIP does not carry the necessary information (subnet mask length). Steinar Haug, system/networks administrator SINTEF RUNIT, University of Trondheim, NORWAY Email: Steinar.Haug@runit.sintef.no, Steinar.Haug@delab.sintef.no
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<STEINAR.HAUG.94Mar6205949@runit.sintef.no>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmd.de!dearn!blekul11!news.cs.kuleuven.ac.be!ub4b!EU.net!sunic!aun.uninett.no!Steinar.HaugReferences:
<1994Mar4.142909.12080@cherokee.nsuok.edu> <bstrauss.762876341@BIX.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fe659,5d0c824272d4a044 X-Google-Attributes: gidfe659,public X-Google-Thread: fcda7,5d0c824272d4a044 X-Google-Attributes: gidfcda7,public X-Google-Thread: 10f035,5d0c824272d4a044 X-Google-Attributes: gid10f035,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-03-06 20:59:49 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!gmd.de!dearn!blekul11!news.cs.kuleuven.ac.be!ub4b!EU.net!sunic!aun.uninett.no!Steinar.Haug From: Steinar.Haug@runit.sintef.no (Steinar Haug) Newsgroups: comp.sys.hp.hpux,comp.sys.novell,bit.listserv.novell Subject: Re: Subnetting Class C IP networks Date: 6 Mar 94 20:59:49 Organization: SINTEF RUNIT, Trondheim, Norway. Lines: 41 Message-ID: <STEINAR.HAUG.94Mar6205949@runit.sintef.no> References: <1994Mar4.142909.12080@cherokee.nsuok.edu> <bstrauss.762876341@BIX.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: tosca.er.sintef.no In-reply-to: bstrauss@BIX.com's message of 5 Mar 94 14:05:41 GMT