Thread View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.flight-sim
25 messages
25 total messages
Started by Terry D
Mon, 20 Jul 1998 00:00
Canopus Pure3D Vs. Diamond Monster 3D II...?
Author: Terry D
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 1998 00:00
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 1998 00:00
10 lines
1574 bytes
1574 bytes
Hi, I would like to know if Canopus's Pure3D II is better than Diamond's Monster II 12mb card. From the reviews, Canopus's card is slightly faster than Diamond's. Can anyone tell me who owns this card if they are happy with it? Any pluses or minuses to consider? Thanks, Terry
Re: Canopus Pure3D Vs. Diamond Monster 3D II...?
Author: RoboRay
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 1998 00:00
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 1998 00:00
10 lines
1784 bytes
1784 bytes
I would answer your question if you hadn't cross-posted it to half of Usenet.
Please read the FAQ and come back.
--
Ray McCalla Quake2:RoboRay[AGQ2]
For e-mail replies, use the singular tense.
http://www.bigfoot.com/~roboray
Terry D cross-posted to WAY to many newsgroups in message
<6p096l$jg2$1@oak.prod.itd.earthlink.net>...
Re: Canopus Pure3D Vs. Diamond Monster 3D II...?
Author: Repo
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 1998 00:00
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 1998 00:00
16 lines
1791 bytes
1791 bytes
Um I am not sure on speed but the features you get a re great fan tv out etc. The only prob is the price but knowing how hot my cl labs v2 ran i suggest canopus! Terry D wrote in message <6p096l$jg2$1@oak.prod.itd.earthlink.net>... >Hi,! > >I would like to know if Canopus's Pure3D II is better than Diamond's Monster >II 12mb card. From the reviews, Canopus's card is slightly faster than >Diamond's. Can anyone tell me who owns this card if they are happy with it? > Any pluses or minuses to consider? > > >Thanks, >Terry
Re: Canopus Pure3D Vs. Diamond Monster 3D II...?
Author: Doug Chism
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 1998 00:00
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 1998 00:00
21 lines
2075 bytes
2075 bytes
I have the Pure 3D II and am happy with it. I only hooked up the TV out once, so I guess it was not worth the extra money for me. At the time the difference was 30$ and I liked the smaller design and the ease of overclocking that came with the Pure 3D II. Only you can decide if it is worth the extra money. I can assure you that the card is a top notch performer and has been very reliable. Terry D wrote in message <6p096l$jg2$1@oak.prod.itd.earthlink.net>... >Hi, > >I would like to know if Canopus's Pure3D II is better than Diamond's Monster >II 12mb card. From the reviews, Canopus's card is slightly faster than >Diamond's. Can anyone tell me who owns this card if they are happy with it? > Any pluses or minuses to consider? > > >Thanks, >Terry
Re: Canopus Pure3D Vs. Diamond Monster 3D II...?
Author: M. V. Mone
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 1998 00:00
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 1998 00:00
27 lines
2393 bytes
2393 bytes
Well, I was talking to this guy, in a deathmatch one night, and he said he had just gotten rid of his Monster card (not sure if he had the voodoo2 version though). He said he didn't like it, it only gave him something like 60fps, while most of us toil away at below 30! Anyway, he traded it in and bought the Pure 3d and was pushing anywhere from 75-100fps. Mind you, this is only what I heard from him and have no proof and don't know what his config was. I only have a PowerVR M3d (heavy sigh). From what I've read though, the voodoo2's are all comparable in performance, so much so, that you probably wouldn't know the difference unless you ran 3d winbench or some kind of benchmark test. Terry D wrote in message <6p096l$jg2$1@oak.prod.itd.earthlink.net>... >Hi, > >I would like to know if Canopus's Pure3D II is better than Diamond's Monster >II 12mb card. From the reviews, Canopus's card is slightly faster than >Diamond's. Can anyone tell me who owns this card if they are happy with it? > Any pluses or minuses to consider? > > >Thanks, >Terry
Re: Canopus Pure3D Vs. Diamond Monster 3D II...?
Author: Rod White
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 1998 00:00
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 1998 00:00
44 lines
2874 bytes
2874 bytes
The Pure3D II is a much nicer board all around IMO. I'm running a Pure3D II with a Pure3D II LX in SLI mode. This allows gamers to purchase the $320 Pure3D II with the excellent TV-out and non-reference design optimized for speed, while allowing them to save a few bucks by picking up the Pure3D II LX for $279 (without the TV-out and cooling fan the Pure3D II features) to add for SLI mode gaming. See other manufacturers make you purchase another identical board and another bundle, which you are paying for. The LX performs the same as the Pure3D II and it's cheaper, it just don't come with the extras. Both are 12MB boards and they're an inch shorter in overall length. This allows it to fit in to smaller, more crowded PC cases. I'm not at all saying the Diamond Monster 3D II is a bad board. I run two 8MB versions in another machine. It's just true that the Pure3D II is a few fps faster than ANY of the reference design boards (Diamond, Orchid, Creative Labs and Wicked 3D). The Canopus stuff is also engineered by them, they didn't clone the reference design like the other companies have. Overall the Pure3D II is a rock solid performer. -- Rod White PC Multimedia & Entertainment Magazine http://www.pcme.com Terry D wrote in message <6p096l$jg2$1@oak.prod.itd.earthlink.net>... >Hi, > >I would like to know if Canopus's Pure3D II is better than Diamond's Monster >II 12mb card. From the reviews, Canopus's card is slightly faster than >Diamond's. Can anyone tell me who owns this card if they are happy with it? > Any pluses or minuses to consider? > > >Thanks, >Terry
Re: Canopus Pure3D Vs. Diamond Monster 3D II...?
Author: Brett I. Holcomb
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 1998 00:00
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 1998 00:00
24 lines
1776 bytes
1776 bytes
I imagine performance wise they aren't that far off. I replaced my Monster 1 with a Pure 3D II (not the LX) and it does very well. I got the model with the cooling fan. cYbErFaRt wrote in message <35B3ECAC.D9FDD4AC@newave.net.au>... >The reviews i have seen say that the Diamond is faster. But either way >the speed difference is so minute its not worth worrying about. >Buy the card that has the best price or software package etc. > >Terry D wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I would like to know if Canopus's Pure3D II is better than Diamond's Monster >> II 12mb card. From the reviews, Canopus's card is slightly faster than >> Diamond's. Can anyone tell me who owns this card if they are happy with it? >> Any pluses or minuses to consider? >> >> Thanks, >> Terry
Re: Canopus Pure3D Vs. Diamond Monster 3D II...?
Author: Greg Hunt
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 1998 00:00
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 1998 00:00
33 lines
2898 bytes
2898 bytes
Yeah, basically I've heard that the Pure3d II is a slightly faster card than the monster 2 (something like 5% faster). However in my personal experience, I've had a monster 2 8 meg card, and I now have SLI Pure3d II. I got 71 fps timedemo's on demo1 in q2 at 800x600 rez with the monster, and I get 60-65 now with the Pure3d's. However at about the same time I changed cards I also installed a monster sound card, and threw on a gravis gamepad. So those might be slowing down the equation some. Windows may be scanning the game port to see what it's doing, and that could be slowing it down. Or the monster sound could be slowing down the game some (this is one of the original monster sounds, not the new MX-200 or whatever). However I haven't tried switching peripherals around and benchmarking.. At the moment 5 fps is not a big enough deal for me to rip my computer apart. Sploid cYbErFaRt wrote: > The reviews i have seen say that the Diamond is faster. But either way > the speed difference is so minute its not worth worrying about. > Buy the card that has the best price or software package etc. > > Terry D wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I would like to know if Canopus's Pure3D II is better than Diamond's Monster > > II 12mb card. From the reviews, Canopus's card is slightly faster than > > Diamond's. Can anyone tell me who owns this card if they are happy with it? > > Any pluses or minuses to consider? > > > > Thanks, > > Terry
Re: Canopus Pure3D Vs. Diamond Monster 3D II...?
Author: Leon_Smith
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 1998 00:00
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 1998 00:00
21 lines
1770 bytes
1770 bytes
I can't comment on the Canopus card but I have a Diamond Monster 3D II and think its great. It installed without problem and has run first time with all my software. Frame rates have gone through the roof! Again I can't comment on Canopus, but Diamond have a nice web site for drivers etc. In article <6p096l$jg2$1@oak.prod.itd.earthlink.net>, NOSPAMterryde@earthlink.com wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to know if Canopus's Pure3D II is better than Diamond's Monster > II 12mb card. From the reviews, Canopus's card is slightly faster than > Diamond's. Can anyone tell me who owns this card if they are happy with it? > Any pluses or minuses to consider? > > Thanks, > Terry > -----== Posted via Deja News, The Leader in Internet Discussion ==----- http://www.dejanews.com/rg_mkgrp.xp Create Your Own Free Member Forum
Re: Canopus Pure3D Vs. Diamond Monster 3D II...?
Author: Leon_Smith
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 1998 00:00
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 1998 00:00
10 lines
1498 bytes
1498 bytes
> config was. I only have a PowerVR M3d (heavy sigh). From what I've read > though, the voodoo2's are all comparable in performance, so much so, that > you probably wouldn't know the difference unless you ran 3d winbench or some I have just upgraded from a PowerVR M3D to a Monster 3D II and it is REALLY worth it, frame rates have soared!! Go and buy one as soon as you can! -----== Posted via Deja News, The Leader in Internet Discussion ==----- http://www.dejanews.com/rg_mkgrp.xp Create Your Own Free Member Forum
Re: Canopus Pure3D Vs. Diamond Monster 3D II...?
Author: Jarg
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 1998 00:00
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 1998 00:00
21 lines
2178 bytes
2178 bytes
Is there a reason you are s\choosing between these two? If you have access to a Fry's Electronics, they were selling the Orchid 12 Meg for $199. last time I checked. I have a couple and so far no problems. Nothing I've read indicates a noticeable difference in performance between the various brands. The Canopus card has the fan and tv out, but for the price difference you could buy another brand and add a fan, with a nice chunk of change left over (unless you really want the tv out). Terry D wrote in message <6p096l$jg2$1@oak.prod.itd.earthlink.net>... >Hi, > >I would like to know if Canopus's Pure3D II is better than Diamond's Monster >II 12mb card. From the reviews, Canopus's card is slightly faster than >Diamond's. Can anyone tell me who owns this card if they are happy with it? > Any pluses or minuses to consider? > > >Thanks, >Terry
Re: Canopus Pure3D Vs. Diamond Monster 3D II...?
Author: Demian Rose
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 1998 00:00
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 1998 00:00
8 lines
1670 bytes
1670 bytes
> Is there a reason you are s\choosing between these two? If you have access > to a Fry's Electronics, they were selling the Orchid 12 Meg for $199. last > time I checked. Do you have a URL for Fry's Electronics? thanx, demian
Re: Canopus Pure3D Vs. Diamond Monster 3D II...?
Author: Jarg
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 1998 00:00
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 1998 00:00
22 lines
2060 bytes
2060 bytes
Sad to say that they apparently do not maintain a web site. They are involved in a legal dispute over the "Fry's: domain. Actually, in every respect save pricing they suck. I was able to locate a partial list of their locations: www.8x8.com/docs/contact/Fryslisting.html This does not include the Fry's in Garland (I think), Texas, and probably others. Demian Rose wrote in message ... >> Is there a reason you are s\choosing between these two? If you have access >> to a Fry's Electronics, they were selling the Orchid 12 Meg for $199. last >> time I checked. > > Do you have a URL for Fry's Electronics? > >thanx, >demian >
Re: Canopus Pure3D Vs. Diamond Monster 3D II...?
Author: RoboRay
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 1998 00:00
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 1998 00:00
11 lines
1881 bytes
1881 bytes
Seems like you need to read a FAQ, too.
--
Ray McCalla Quake2:RoboRay[AGQ2]
For e-mail replies, use the singular tense.
http://www.bigfoot.com/~roboray
Rod White wrote in message <6p0uk2$jje$0@207.18.94.14>...
>Who the hell are you? I HATE self appointed net-cops.
>It looks like he posted to the newsgroups he WANTED
>to post to. I don't see what's wrong with that.
Re: Canopus Pure3D Vs. Diamond Monster 3D II...?
Author: Dennis Duyck
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 1998 00:00
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 1998 00:00
6 lines
1202 bytes
1202 bytes
i just read an article online about 3d cards at the following: http://www.gamecenter.com/Hardware/Roundup/Voodoo2/?st.gc.fd.m.ha they talk about the voodoo2 cards out there, the one they recommend is the canopus pure, although the monster 3d II came in a close second.
Re: Canopus Pure3D Vs. Diamond Monster 3D II...?
Author: Terry Thiel
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 1998 00:00
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 1998 00:00
21 lines
2028 bytes
2028 bytes
I have a Pure3D II and think you will find that it has many more features in terms of software capabilities and much better tech support than Diamond. Canopus is also the king of drivers. I have seen the same games with clearer sharper graphics on the Pure3D II than on the Diamond VII. If you want the best buy Canopus. -Terry In article <6p096l$jg2$1@oak.prod.itd.earthlink.net>, NOSPAMterryde@earthlink.com wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to know if Canopus's Pure3D II is better than Diamond's Monster > II 12mb card. From the reviews, Canopus's card is slightly faster than > Diamond's. Can anyone tell me who owns this card if they are happy with it? > Any pluses or minuses to consider? > > > Thanks, > Terry
Re: Canopus Pure3D Vs. Diamond Monster 3D II...?
Author: cYbErFaRt
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 1998 00:00
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 1998 00:00
15 lines
1917 bytes
1917 bytes
The reviews i have seen say that the Diamond is faster. But either way the speed difference is so minute its not worth worrying about. Buy the card that has the best price or software package etc. Terry D wrote: > > Hi, > > I would like to know if Canopus's Pure3D II is better than Diamond's Monster > II 12mb card. From the reviews, Canopus's card is slightly faster than > Diamond's. Can anyone tell me who owns this card if they are happy with it? > Any pluses or minuses to consider? > > Thanks, > Terry
Re: Canopus Pure3D Vs. Diamond Monster 3D II...?
Author: Rod White
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 1998 00:00
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 1998 00:00
24 lines
1954 bytes
1954 bytes
Who the hell are you? I HATE self appointed net-cops. It looks like he posted to the newsgroups he WANTED to post to. I don't see what's wrong with that. -- Rod White PC Multimedia & Entertainment Magazine http://www.pcme.com RoboRay <2roboray@bigfeet.com> wrote in message <6p0anl$al0$1@supernews.com>... >I would answer your question if you hadn't cross-posted it to half of Usenet. >Please read the FAQ and come back. > >-- >Ray McCalla Quake2:RoboRay[AGQ2] >For e-mail replies, use the singular tense. > http://www.bigfoot.com/~roboray > >Terry D cross-posted to WAY to many newsgroups in message ><6p096l$jg2$1@oak.prod.itd.earthlink.net>... > >
Re: Canopus Pure3D Vs. Diamond Monster 3D II...?
Author: PNN
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 1998 00:00
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 1998 00:00
22 lines
2155 bytes
2155 bytes
I have run with both the 8mb and 12mb versions of the M3DII, and it's fairly much like every other V2 card out there. Suppose depends on if you like Diamond's support or not. Personally I have found Canopus cards to be better refined, but more expensive. Also, are you looking at the top model with fan and TV output or the one without? Terry D wrote in message <6p096l$jg2$1@oak.prod.itd.earthlink.net>... >Hi, > >I would like to know if Canopus's Pure3D II is better than Diamond's Monster >II 12mb card. From the reviews, Canopus's card is slightly faster than >Diamond's. Can anyone tell me who owns this card if they are happy with it? > Any pluses or minuses to consider? > > >Thanks, >Terry
Re: Canopus Pure3D Vs. Diamond Monster 3D II...?
Author: Bob "AMRAAM" Roberts
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 1998 00:00
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 1998 00:00
15 lines
1892 bytes
1892 bytes
Well, let's put it this way - I have 2 M3D IIs in SLI and in UNREAL running at 1024 x 768, we're looking at 40 fps... Sure the Canopus PURE 3D IIs may give me a faster frame rate but I know I paid much LESS for the two of mine...;-) Besides, when I had the PURE 3Ds, some games had problems with Canopus drivers - and yes, their legendary tech support came out with patches... but personally, I prefer not to deal with the issues of d/l patches and etc etc IMHO. Besides, anything outside 32 FPS is negligible right? Bob
Re: Canopus Pure3D Vs. Diamond Monster 3D II...?
Author: Jasta
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 1998 00:00
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 1998 00:00
22 lines
1824 bytes
1824 bytes
Bob "AMRAAM" Roberts wrote in message <6p3jsi$2mm$1@mawar.singnet.com.sg>...
>
>Besides, anything outside 32 FPS is negligible right?
>
Nope!
>
>Bob
>
>
--
-Jasta
jasta-jasta@usa.net
mail me your Haus logfiles and see the stats here:
http://www.fortunecity.com/underworld/mario/639/
...include log date and approx. log time in the email, please. :)
Re: Canopus Pure3D Vs. Diamond Monster 3D II...?
Author: Zippy D. Cortex
Date: Sun, 26 Jul 1998 00:00
Date: Sun, 26 Jul 1998 00:00
1 lines
1689 bytes
1689 bytes
I think the both of you need to rent a room. : )
Re: Canopus Pure3D Vs. Diamond Monster 3D II...?
Author: Richard Blake
Date: Sun, 26 Jul 1998 00:00
Date: Sun, 26 Jul 1998 00:00
1 lines
1554 bytes
1554 bytes
but use protection! hehehe
Re: Canopus Pure3D Vs. Diamond Monster 3D II...?
Author: cK{SpLatt}
Date: Sat, 01 Aug 1998 00:00
Date: Sat, 01 Aug 1998 00:00
33 lines
2159 bytes
2159 bytes
On Mon, 20 Jul 1998 21:28:25 -0500, "Brett I. Holcomb" <bretth@txk777.com> wrote: >I imagine performance wise they aren't that far off. I replaced my Monster >1 with a Pure 3D II (not the LX) and it does very well. I got the model >with the cooling fan. > > > >cYbErFaRt wrote in message <35B3ECAC.D9FDD4AC@newave.net.au>... >>The reviews i have seen say that the Diamond is faster. But either way >>the speed difference is so minute its not worth worrying about. >>Buy the card that has the best price or software package etc. >> >>Terry D wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I would like to know if Canopus's Pure3D II is better than Diamond's >Monster >>> II 12mb card. From the reviews, Canopus's card is slightly faster than >>> Diamond's. Can anyone tell me who owns this card if they are happy with >it? >>> Any pluses or minuses to consider? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Terry I hear that the Diamond is faster in 24mb SLI mode, but not 12mb. It's kinda wierd actually. But from the what i've heard the Canopus Pure3d Voodoo2 offers additional software things, and some other featured programs. Frip
Re: Canopus Pure3D Vs. Diamond Monster 3D II...?
Author: PPG-MD-1032
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 1998 00:00
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 1998 00:00
7 lines
1796 bytes
1796 bytes
The Diamond has the best saftware package, Imcoming(full), Monster Truck Maddness 2(full), and Battle Zone(full, with enhancements). Price wise, well I find that most cards about the same, but check out your local stores. -- Diplomacy:(noun) The art of saying good dog, until you can find a big enough nuke.
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads