Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.comm
Article #228Re: Psion Dacom Surfer vs. Diamond SupraExpress 336i
From: Anthony Hill
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 1997 00:00
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 1997 00:00
37 lines
2631 bytes
2631 bytes
On 16 Apr 1997 14:17:45 GMT, mhoenig@ast.cam.ac.uk (Michael Hoenig) wrote: >I have decide to finally buy my own modem and it looks like two 33.6k modems >have made it to the final choice (because of price/quality considerations >mainly!): the Psion Dacom Surfer and the Diamond SupraExpress 336i (internal). >The Surfer got really good reviews, and I would be willing to purchase it >despite its rather garish (or "stylish" as the PR dept. puts it) exterior. The >SupraExpress also seems a good choice, and it seems to have Flash ROM which FWIW the SupraExpress 33.6i does not have FlashROM. The SupraExpress 56k does, the SupraFAXmodems and SupraSonics do, but not the plain old Express 33.6 (unless this was changed recently and/or different for the UK as opposed to North America). >might be a wise investment. But internal modems are more difficult to set up, >right? All that IRQ bother. The SupraExpress at least is a Plug 'n Pray ONLY modem, which means it'll either be really easy to set up (just plug it in and turn on your computer) or a HUGE pain in the butt if PnP doesn't work (and, as you might be able to guess from the Plug 'n Pray name, PnP often does not work). Setting the jumpers for comm and IRQ ports isn't really that complicated. Com3 IRQ5 almost always works. Anyway, as for the modems, I can't rally comment on the Psion Dacom Surfer since I've never heard of it. As for the SupraExpress though, I'd definately avoid that one. Supra makes soem excellent modems in their FAXmodem and Sonic line, but in all testing their Express line is outperformed by the FAXmodem and Sonics by a LONG margin (like an Express getting 2500byte/s+ on a Network sim test where the FAXmodems are getting about 3000byte/s). In that sort of price range, the modem that I'd personnaly recommend would be the Motorola ModemSURFR 33.6. Anthony Hill | Despite popular belief, this ahill@travel-net.com | is NOT a .sig file.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3354f465.1042311@nntp.uunet.ca>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<5j2n29$fc@lyra.csx.cam.ac.uk>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10beba,74ee2393043e994a X-Google-Attributes: gid10beba,public X-Google-Thread: 102a94,74ee2393043e994a X-Google-Attributes: gid102a94,public X-Google-Thread: 105ed0,74ee2393043e994a X-Google-Attributes: gid105ed0,public From: ahill@travel-net.com (Anthony Hill) Subject: Re: Psion Dacom Surfer vs. Diamond SupraExpress 336i Date: 1997/04/16 Message-ID: <3354f465.1042311@nntp.uunet.ca> X-Deja-AN: 235562336 References: <5j2n29$fc@lyra.csx.cam.ac.uk> Organization: UUNET Canada News Transport Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.comm,demon.tech.modems,comp.dcom.modems