Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.comm
Article #229Re: Psion Dacom Surfer vs. Diamond SupraExpress 336i
From: Art To Choke
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 1997 00:00
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 1997 00:00
44 lines
2403 bytes
2403 bytes
mhoenig@ast.cam.ac.uk (Michael Hoenig) wrote: >Hi there, >I have decide to finally buy my own modem and it looks like two 33.6k modems >have made it to the final choice (because of price/quality considerations >mainly!): the Psion Dacom Surfer and the Diamond SupraExpress 336i (internal). >The Surfer got really good reviews, and I would be willing to purchase it >despite its rather garish (or "stylish" as the PR dept. puts it) exterior. The >SupraExpress also seems a good choice, and it seems to have Flash ROM which >might be a wise investment. But internal modems are more difficult to set up, >right? All that IRQ bother. >If anyone has any advice or experience regarding these two modems I'd be very >grateful for any e-mail. Thanks! Hey Mike, I have a Surfer and seeing as you don't seem to have had many replies regarding this modem, I thought I'd stick my oar in! Firstly I would like to say that I was also rather daunted by the stylish look it gave, thinking that it was all show and no trousers!! But...I was wrong, it belts along. It also seemed to be a good deal and a rather good shape for my cluttered desk! Anyway...down to performance. VERY good. Hardly any line drops and a very good constant speed. I haven't actually been able to connect at full 33.6k as yet, but I have a feeling it's my phone line or a dodgy init string. In summary I thoroughly recommend this modem and ask you not to be concerned about the snazzy look of the thing! It does the job and does it well. Damn, I should be an ad woman or a rep! Regards, Tiffany -- ----------Art To Choke---------- http://www.tiffg.demon.co.uk
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<861331809.18071.2@tiffg.demon.co.uk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<5j2n29$fc@lyra.csx.cam.ac.uk>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10beba,74ee2393043e994a X-Google-Attributes: gid10beba,public X-Google-Thread: 105ed0,74ee2393043e994a X-Google-Attributes: gid105ed0,public X-Google-Thread: 102a94,74ee2393043e994a X-Google-Attributes: gid102a94,public From: art.to.choke@tiffg.demon.co.uk (Art To Choke) Subject: Re: Psion Dacom Surfer vs. Diamond SupraExpress 336i Date: 1997/04/18 Message-ID: <861331809.18071.2@tiffg.demon.co.uk> X-Deja-AN: 235600843 X-NNTP-Posting-Host: tiffg.demon.co.uk References: <5j2n29$fc@lyra.csx.cam.ac.uk> Organization: Art To Choke Reply-To: art.to.choke@tiffg.demon.co.uk Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.comm,demon.tech.modems,comp.dcom.modems