Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.misc
Article #628Re: Gigabyte HX2 or TX ??
From: AM WEBER
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 1997 00:00
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 1997 00:00
26 lines
1505 bytes
1505 bytes
Harry Broomhall (haeb@demon.net) wrote: : AM WEBER wrote: : > : > AM WEBER (weberam@aston.ac.uk) wrote: : > : Mark Booth (markb@oxim.demon.co.uk) wrote: : > : : In article <344F6CE9.446B@demon.net>, Harry Broomhall <haeb@demon.net> : > : : writes : > : : > : : AMD640 and VP2 (essentialy the same silicon) support 2Mb of cache and is : > : : not restricted to 64Mb cachability, as well as all of the TX's features. : > : : VP3 also supports AGP etc. Both should be faster than their Intel : > : : competitors. : > : : > : The last run of HX boards can cache 512MB RAM, not just 64MB. : > : : [SNIP] : : : Please be carefull of your snipping. I did not write any part of : the quote you posted. : OK, no need to get your knickers in a twist!!! Adam
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<631ssr$nkg$1@whatsit.aston.ac.uk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<877617086snz@javiaton.demon.co.uk> <344F6CE9.446B@demon.net> <5dQfzJAAZKU00AeC@oxim.demon.co.uk> <62qdua$r3o$1@whatsit.aston.ac.uk> <62qedf$r3o$2@whatsit.aston.ac.uk> <3450C53C.446B@demon.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1036bc,31f7c1d9c6588be5 X-Google-Attributes: gid1036bc,public X-Google-Thread: 109e38,31f7c1d9c6588be5 X-Google-Attributes: gid109e38,public From: weberam@aston.ac.uk (AM WEBER) Subject: Re: Gigabyte HX2 or TX ?? Date: 1997/10/27 Message-ID: <631ssr$nkg$1@whatsit.aston.ac.uk> X-Deja-AN: 285270238 References: <877617086snz@javiaton.demon.co.uk> <344F6CE9.446B@demon.net> <5dQfzJAAZKU00AeC@oxim.demon.co.uk> <62qdua$r3o$1@whatsit.aston.ac.uk> <62qedf$r3o$2@whatsit.aston.ac.uk> <3450C53C.446B@demon.net> Followup-To: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.misc,demon.tech.pc Organization: Aston University Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.misc,demon.tech.pc