🚀 go-pugleaf

Mike wrote:
> 
> In article <877617086snz@javiaton.demon.co.uk>
>            Clough@javiaton.demon.co.uk "Jonathan Clough" writes:
> 
> >   Gigabyte TX board with a K6-200 or 233
> >
> > However I notice Gigabyte now have a HX board that supports the K6-233 (the
> > HX-2) and I wonder if this might be a better board over the TX ?
> 
> The TX supercedes the HX, adding Ultra DMA (essentially, it supports a faster
> IDE hard drive) and a few other minor bits and bobs. The stocks of HX based
> boards are being run down so you might get one cheap, but I would still go
> for the TX.

I've never seen a TX board be MORE expensive than an HX board. HX
boards support more memory, can cache more (though usually need
more tag ram), and usually have more SIMM slots (my Tyan Tomcat I
has eight SIMM Slots, which is something that was very important
to me). HX boards are usually about 20-30 dollars more from the 
same company, in my experience.

-bill