Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage
Article #1007Re: floppy data and airport x-rays
From: Rick Russell
Date: Tue, 12 May 1998 00:00
Date: Tue, 12 May 1998 00:00
23 lines
1629 bytes
1629 bytes
In article <35782e3e.2088195736@news.demon.co.uk>, Harry Broomhall <haeb@demon.net> wrote: > Normal airport X-ray machines won't harm them. If you want to be > absolutely sure I have always found that handing such material in an > open box to the search officers was always OK. Sometime back in the 80s, Byte Magazine did an objective test. They took about 100 800K floppies and 100 360K floppies, wrote a test pattern on them, and subjected them to standard checked and unchecked baggage X-ray machines. They found that the failure rate (where "failure" is at least 1 wrong bit on the entire disk) among the zapped disks was substantially higher, both for the standard X-ray and the unchecked bags X-ray. I don't remember the exact number, but I think it was around 7%, compared to around 1% for the control group. However, since the disks were simply carried or checked by Byte staffers on routine flights, they couldn't rule out environmental or magnetic contamination due to something other than X-rays. Rick R.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<6ja30v$64s$1@joe.rice.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<dLKK+CAAYyV1EwnZ@otterson.demon.co.uk> <35782e3e.2088195736@news.demon.co.uk>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1036bc,b3dd300c81e04261 X-Google-Attributes: gid1036bc,public X-Google-Thread: f4d7c,b3dd300c81e04261 X-Google-Attributes: gidf4d7c,public From: rickr@is.rice.edu (Rick Russell) Subject: Re: floppy data and airport x-rays Date: 1998/05/12 Message-ID: <6ja30v$64s$1@joe.rice.edu> X-Deja-AN: 352615770 References: <dLKK+CAAYyV1EwnZ@otterson.demon.co.uk> <35782e3e.2088195736@news.demon.co.uk> Reply-To: rickr@is.rice.edu Organization: Rice University Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage,demon.tech.pc