Re: ZiP -vs- EZ135

Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage

Article #170

Back to comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage Previous Next

#170

From: Maxwell Daymon
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 1995 22:38

7 lines
985 bytes

Bob (brink@jax-inter.net) wrote:
:      Parallel port will be noticeably slower in moving data than SCSI. But
: parallel port is portable, SCSI is essentially not.  You have to decide what is
: important to what you want to do.

A proper SCSI setup is *almost* as easy to transport with - but it's far 
faster than a parallel solution.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <4c1ql7$ae8@natasha.rmii.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!news.rmii.com!rainbow!mdaymon

References:

<4bfgk7$of0@bmerhc5e.bnr.ca> <global1.net-2612951954150001@ppp10.global1.net> <4bqhlq$m9p@solaris.cc.vt.edu> <4c01ev$42p@news.ust.hk> <4c0r9m$9ig@alterdial.UU.NET>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!news.rmii.com!rainbow!mdaymon
From: mdaymon@rainbow.rmii.com (Maxwell Daymon)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage,comp.periphs,comp.periphs.scsi
Subject: Re: ZiP -vs- EZ135
Followup-To: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage,comp.periphs,comp.periphs.scsi
Date: 29 Dec 1995 22:38:31 GMT
Organization: Rocky Mountain Internet Inc.
Message-ID: <4c1ql7$ae8@natasha.rmii.com>
References: <4bfgk7$of0@bmerhc5e.bnr.ca> <global1.net-2612951954150001@ppp10.global1.net> <4bqhlq$m9p@solaris.cc.vt.edu> <4c01ev$42p@news.ust.hk> <4c0r9m$9ig@alterdial.UU.NET>
NNTP-Posting-Host: rainbow.rmii.com
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]

Reply to Parent Message