Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage
Article #171Re: ZiP -vs- EZ135
From: John M. Merrill
Date: Sat, 30 Dec 1995 00:24
Date: Sat, 30 Dec 1995 00:24
25 lines
1594 bytes
1594 bytes
primal@vt.edu (Primal Scream) wrote: >global1.net (asterisk) wrote: >>A few differences: Zip uses floppy type cartridges -in a rigid case- and >>the EZ uses hard drive type disks in its cartridges. The EZ is a little >>faster when getting data off its cartridges. Price nearly the same these >>days and the cartridges are the same price. The EZ cartridge holds a bit >>more data (after you reformat it) than does the Zip drive cartridge. >And on the other side, the Zip is available in a Parallel port model >with Internals soon behind, one of which has a 1.44mb FDD riding >piggyback. Zip also has a huge owner base and several vendors lined >up to produce disks, which means disk price will likely drop. And from what I've read and heard, the zip is more likely to become a standard, as far as larger floppies go. In my opinion, the portability of the drive itself is not nearly as attractive as the thought of being able to take your 100-meg floppy to you colleague's house or office and know that he has a drive that will handle it. John
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4c1t7g$9vm@mack.rt66.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!mack.rt66.com!usenetReferences:
<4bfgk7$of0@bmerhc5e.bnr.ca> <global1.net-2612951954150001@ppp10.global1.net> <4bqhlq$m9p@solaris.cc.vt.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!mack.rt66.com!usenet From: merrijm@RT66.com (John M. Merrill) Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage,comp.periphs,comp.periphs.scsi Subject: Re: ZiP -vs- EZ135 Date: Sat, 30 Dec 1995 00:24:20 GMT Organization: Rt66.COM, Public Internet Access in New Mexico Message-ID: <4c1t7g$9vm@mack.rt66.com> References: <4bfgk7$of0@bmerhc5e.bnr.ca> <global1.net-2612951954150001@ppp10.global1.net> <4bqhlq$m9p@solaris.cc.vt.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: pmd27.rt66.com X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82