Article View: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage
Article #326Re: Adaptec Vs. BusLogic Fast/Wide adapters...
From: Brian Case
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 1996 04:42
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 1996 04:42
52 lines
3166 bytes
3166 bytes
Leonard N. Zubkoff wrote: > > In article <4g1qpd$5gs@steel.interlog.com> ldh@interlog.com (Laurent-David Hasson) writes: > > I have had a BusLogic 956C (Fast/Wide SCSI II) card for a couple of > months now, and 2 HAWK 1GB F/W drives. I have been a little bit > disappointed by the performance of that combo under Win'95. > > I posted a few questions, and the result is that: > - Win'95 is imply not a good SCSI plaform > - The BusLogic adapter is not a great performer.... > > I agree with the first one, and i will probably try to install Linux and NT > for fun and see what kind of performance i get. The second argument however > surprised me... Can anybody confirm this "allegation" ? Should i send the > BusLogic back and get another Fast/Wide adapter ? > > The BusLogic BT-956C has been an excellent performer in my system, but then > I run Linux and not Win95. With a poor SCSI implementation above it, it's > quite possible that it might not perform up to its potential. The 965C seems OK on my win95 system. I got the latest driver from the buslogic ftp site, though. I have tested the 965C and the Promise Tech. DC540 (NCR 53C825-based F/W) under win95. I get pretty much equivalent performance with the NCR-based adapter being a few % faster. I'm still testing to be sure of my results, but I feel pretty confident of the numbers so far. I suspect Linux will show the 965C as faster since the driver supports all the features; (the NCR driver doesn't). BUT NOTE: unless you are connecting a high-quality drive with good intrinsic performance, the fast/wide capability will win you nothing. A high-quality drive on a plain fast scsi-ii bus will probably get you all the performance you need. In fact, my experience shows that a high-quality EIDE drive is probably the best deal for most systems. I was horrified to see my EIDE drive beating my fast/wide setup; but when I connected a good drive (Atlas 32150W), I saw a big boost. Probably would've seen the same boost with a non-wide Atlas on an 8-bit scsi bus. BTW, this is a 100-MHz Zappa-based system. bcase PS. The promise board can accept the flash-bios upgrade available from the symbios web site. Also, there is a new win95 driver there (or somewhere, can't really remember now where I got it) that allows you to enable fast-20 support; thus, it appears that the NCR-based F/W boards are actually capable of F/W-20. Don't have anyway of testing it, though. Doubt I'd see any effect anyway, the media transfer rate isn't even 10 MB/s yet....
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3127FFCB.199E@best.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!shellx.best.com!usenetReferences:
<4g1qpd$5gs@steel.interlog.com> <4g2jjo$3rc@kelewan.dandelion.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!shellx.best.com!usenet From: Brian Case <bcase@best.com> Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage,comp.periphs.scsi Subject: Re: Adaptec Vs. BusLogic Fast/Wide adapters... Date: Sun, 18 Feb 1996 20:42:51 -0800 Organization: Best Internet Communications Message-ID: <3127FFCB.199E@best.com> References: <4g1qpd$5gs@steel.interlog.com> <4g2jjo$3rc@kelewan.dandelion.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: bcase.vip.best.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0GoldB1 (Win95; I)